shady lady
Courtier
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2021
- Messages
- 528
- City
- The South West
- Country
- United Kingdom
This comment I find so strange. Do we expect Catherine, when accompanying her husband at the Bafta's, which is his patronage, not hers, to just turn up in a low key manner, slipping quietly in her seat? No, we fully expect her to accompany her husband as a wife and supporter should. Beside him, appropriately dressed. So, why can't Megan be allowed to do the same. Because we don't like her and don't want to see her face? Well that is our problem, not hers. No matter how little I think of her, it is her right to walk beside her husband.
You may be taking the quote I used a little too literally and as we say here in the UK "got the wrong end of the stick" or have missed the point I was trying to make. I wasn't suggesting MM should be superglued to her seat and not allowed to move or walk next to PH; that would be ridiculous. Nor am I implying she should wear a paper bag over her head if she does walk beside PH or wherever she goes - again, ridiculous.
I borrowed the quote you read from a previous post I made where it was an example of how MM could have conducted herself differently and drawn less attention to herself during the games. Where you saw it, I was using it in a reply to demonstrate that I had no problem with her being there. I thought that was obvious TBH, but maybe not. Perhaps if you read the entire post it originally came from, it would make more sense and not seem so "strange".
In any case, the Invictus Games are now over and for me, it's time to move on.
Last edited: