not at all. People simply think that the chances of the entire Wales family perishing at once, is minimal
BTW, 99% of polls run by tabloid newspapers in the UK are extremely unscientifically conducted, aren’t weighted and therefore aren’t worth the paper they’re written on.
When they got married, I didn't think they'd divorce. Then, they split for North America and my thought process began to shift and everything that's happened since then has only solidified my belief that she will dump him once she's squeezed him dry. But, maybe not, if she can't get the kind of financial settlement out of Charles that Diana got out of him & HLMQ - and she won't if they keep on with their attacks on the family. They've cut him off and his net worth is tied to their Sussex brand now.
This.not at all. People simply think that the chances of the entire Wales family perishing at once, is minimal
(...)
What do his defenders think on the hitting bodyguard and mocking the disabled matron parts?
I don't believe she will dump him.
At her age, and with her baggage, she is unlikely to do better, and she will need him to provide the lifestyle she enjoys.
Interesting. The bridesmaids' dress saga actually has TWO contexts, both provided by the Sussexes. Meghan's wails on Oprah when she made it sound like callous Waity Katy watched the gentle bride collapse in tears and Harry's explanation that at best, she heard about it on the gravepine after he himself found Meghan weeping on the floor.Unimportant, not worth any comments nor discussing, so let's talk about the bridesmaids' dress saga instead. You see, because "context"
Good grief! That's outrageous, disrespectful and totally hilarious! I don't imagine Harry and Meghan ever thought he'd be mocked so mercilessly but to the rest of us, it was obvious that over-sharing his penis would invite ridicule. Their ignorance of consequences is just another example of the deluded bubble they live in.
Another "parody" about the prince and his penis:
Never have I ever imagined anyone will make fun of Diana in such way.
Now, tell me again why it's a good idea to put that story in his book? Would Harrold start demanding apology from American media too? Or this is British media's fault too? Or the Royal Family has start colluding with American media so it's also their fault (you see, because they're jealous of his best-selling book and now trying to sabotage him)?
As you sow, so you reap!!
(...)
In a stunning backfire from his memoir spare, the Duke of Sussex has landed at the centre of an international firestorm between the United Kingdom and the Islamic regime in Tehran.
The Iran Foreign Ministry’s official Twitter account turned its rhetorical crosshairs toward the Duke in an escalating row over the execution of UK citizen, and former Iranian deputy defence minister, Alireza Akbari.
“The British regime, whose royal family member, sees the killing of 25 innocent people as removal of chess pieces and has no regrets over the issue, and those who turn a blind eye to this war crime, are in no position to preach others on human rights.”
(...)
Prince Harry faces war crimes charge in stunning Spare backfire
Well, mentioning his number doesn't really matter, right? Because what's important (the context) is it helps Harold in his PTSD and by sharing it he also reduces veteran suicide.
Anyway, let's just discuss the bridesmaids dress again. Or the book sales, it's best selling, right?
On serious note, at this rate inviting him to the coronation might not a good idea. Coronation is about the institution after all, not family gathering. Arabic counties will keep bringing up this story, not just about the kills count but also the war between Muslim vs Christian part. Yes I know, "context" is important, but do those people really care about it when they bring it up? Or should UK sacrifice any semblance of diplomatic relations with those countries for Harold? Well, maybe it will finally satisfy him because the most important thing is his feeling, right?
Interesting. The bridesmaids' dress saga actually has TWO contexts, both provided by the Sussexes. Meghan's wails on Oprah when she made it sound like callous Waity Katy watched the gentle bride collapse in tears and Harry's explanation that at best, she heard about it on the gravepine after he himself found Meghan weeping on the floor.
I don't believe either of those "contexts". But sure, what matters is that Catherine is guilty and Meghan is a victim. Always!
Does the unimportant part holds true when we're talking about sensitive Meghan weeping because she was unprotected and weak staff members weeping because they couldn't take the constructive criticism the sensitive Duchess heaped on them as well? Is the difference also unimportant to notice?
Another "parody" about the prince and his penis:
Never have I ever imagined anyone will make fun of Diana in such way.
Now, tell me again why it's a good idea to put that story in his book? Would Harrold start demanding apology from American media too? Or this is British media's fault too? Or the Royal Family has start colluding with American media so it's also their fault (you see, because they're jealous of his best-selling book and now trying to sabotage him)?
Well, I don’t think it had to do with him per say, just that the other board members just didn’t invite them.Not surprised they were both persona-non-gratis for the BAFTA Tea Party since Prince William is BAFTA President
Harry and Meghan wouldn't be so stupid to go after the US media, would they?
And out of all of them, there is just one participant who proudly claimed that she could cry on demand.I’m willing to believe Meghan may have cried- but on the floor crying sounds over dramatic to me. (Like other passages from this book.) I know it happens- but I would expect the context to be more serious and traumatic than this.
Good point about the different crying stories in this book.
Not surprised they were both persona-non-gratis for the BAFTA Tea Party since Prince William is BAFTA President
Harry and Meghan wouldn't be so stupid to go after the US media, would they?
Not sure if this has been mentioned, but IF the Sussexes attended the Coronation, I believe it would make it much more dangerous for all concerned ..
.
Oh what a hornets nest Harry has poked...he should fire his entire PR team.
Maybe this is the only "right" thing Iranians have done so far,
if and I hope so this will cause so much diplomatic confusion
it will spare Britain from Harry at the coronation.
If I was Meghan(never expected to try this) I'd push him out right now for
putting my children to extra danger.
Let's hope so. In germany where we live at the moment there is a saying,
literally translated : next week another pig is hunted through the village.
As I am not of English mothertongue I don't know an equivalent, but sure the grman saying is understood.
Us are said to be super superficial, so let's see how fast they forget and H&M will be back, if they ever went out?