Sunnystar
Serene Highness
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 1,007
- City
- Oregon
- Country
- United States
Harry doesn’t have to “prove” that he had voicemails and didn’t receive notifications, per se.
The judge can consider the sum of his testimony and decide— you know, if it was just that he didn’t recall getting some notifications, or that some things showed up that came from unlikely sources, or some photographers always knew where he was, each of those things wouldn’t convince me, but the convergence of all of these things indeed makes it more likely than not that the defendants did what they are accused of.
Frankly, I think this is a likely outcome.
See, now, I think that the opposite is true, because Harry has admitted, during questioning by Green, that his memory is inaccurate - did he or did he not want a meeting with Paul Burrell? He says "oh, no, definitely not" but that was contradicted by what he wrote in Spare. So, how can he be entirely certain that he didn't receive VM notifications? He can't, and just because he says so now doesn't mean that is what happened. By admitting that his memory is faulty on the Burrell meeting, as well as some of the other inconsistencies, I'm inclined to believe the defense has cast enough probable doubt on any of Harry's assertions about missing VM notifications.