I also think it’s fascinating that Harry could call his own therapist, but he couldn’t get help for his suicidal wife. That makes sense.
Good point.
I also think it’s fascinating that Harry could call his own therapist, but he couldn’t get help for his suicidal wife. That makes sense.
My first reaction on reading that was how frustrating it must have been to see Harry respond that his family was only repeating a press narrative. They'd met Meghan. They'd shared a staff. They had no need to go by press reports.
If one person tells you your wife is a problem, they might be the problem. If most of the people who know you and who work with you are telling you your wife is a problem, you maybe need to think about your wife.
And as for Meghan, Harry loves her deeply and has been more than loyal to her. If people around him expected that he was going to get a divorce because of their comments then they would be and were, mightily mistaken.
Good point.
Holy heck. If that excerpt is accurate then there is zero chance of Harry ever returning to work for the RF.
My first reaction on reading that was how frustrating it must have been to see Harry respond that his family was only repeating a press narrative. They'd met Meghan. They'd shared a staff. They had no need to go by press reports.
If one person tells you your wife is a problem, they might be the problem. If most of the people who know you and who work with you are telling you your wife is a problem, you maybe need to think about your wife.
I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t stand for my sibling maligning my spouse.
I gotta say, nothing about this shocks me.
I think there's a lot of middle ground there. Harry didn't have to divorce her, but he could have spoken with her.
In my own personal life, I have an aunt who is very difficult and married to an extremely laid back and easy going man. He loves her and they've been married nearly 50 years, but he knows she's got a temper and can be difficult with service staff and others. He always tips them extra and tells them to pay her no mind. You can love someone while seeing both the good and the bad.
It is probably best not to make assumptions. All we know, if this reporting turns out to be accurate, is that Harry’s sibling was trashing Harry’s wife.
Yeah if that’s it, well then. Could be Guardian are holding back articles ready to go on publication day before the rest have had a chance to read it.
Interesting that this showed up in a very non monarchist, republican newspaper. With no royal,reporters and not part old the rota and one that stays out of,the Harry and Meghan world. Interesting.
True.
My first reaction is I just don’t buy what Harry’s selling. I don’t buy this exact version of events anyway. Not without proof. He and Meghan are always the victims. And somehow Harry is pretty much a pacifist in any version of events. It’s always what someone has done to them.
I do think it’s bizarre that he claims to have thought William was just repeating negative press. William knows Meghan. Anything he thought about Meghan would be based on his personal experience and people he trusted.
I also think it’s fascinating that Harry could call his own therapist, but he couldn’t get help for his suicidal wife. That makes sense.
Having followed this story closely from the beginning, I think that the bullying allegations are well-established and have been credibly reported from multiple sources, none of which have been sued under Britain's extremely generous libel laws. There are factual reasons to treat allegations of Meghan's bullying of staff as credible.
I used to work in PR and corporate communications. This may have been a targeting leak.
My impression is that the brothers were less close after Meghan came on the scene. We actually don’t know how well William even knew Meghan.
Having followed this story closely from the beginning, I think that the bullying allegations are well-established and have been credibly reported from multiple sources, none of which have been sued under Britain's extremely generous libel laws. There are factual reasons to treat allegations of Meghan's bullying of staff as credible.
I think there's a lot of middle ground there. Harry didn't have to divorce her, but he could have spoken with her.
In my own personal life, I have an aunt who is very difficult and married to an extremely laid back and easy going man. He loves her and they've been married nearly 50 years, but he knows she's got a temper and can be difficult with service staff and others. He always tips them extra and tells them to pay her no mind. You can love someone while seeing both the good and the bad.
Having followed this story closely from the beginning, I think that the bullying allegations are well-established and have been credibly reported from multiple sources, none of which have been sued under Britain's extremely generous libel laws. There are factual reasons to treat allegations of Meghan's bullying of staff as credible.
One thing to keep in mind... This is Harry's recollection of the confrontation. It is an entirely one-sided account of an incident that had no other witnesses. I suspect we're going to get a strongly worded reiteration of "recollections may vary" from BP/KP. They aren't really going to have any choice but to respond to the allegation that William physically attacked his own brother.
Having followed this story closely from the beginning, I think that the bullying allegations are well-established and have been credibly reported from multiple sources, none of which have been sued under Britain's extremely generous libel laws. There are factual reasons to treat allegations of Meghan's bullying of staff as credible.
Factually, we know that they shared an office and a staff from the time of Meghan's engagement until the announced household split. They were also neighbors at Kensington Palace from the time Meghan moved to the United Kingdom until the Sussexes moved to Windsor. We also know factually that Meghan stayed in the Wales' home in Norfolk over Christmas. We can reasonably infer from these facts that the Wales couple knew the Duchess of Sussex well enough to form personal opinions.
Well, BP, under the orders of the late Queen herself, refused to publish any of the results of the Inquiry which included any bullying allegations against anybody, the Sussexes, or other royals, any courtiers, any senior staff etc. so nobody is likely to know anything about such allegations, let alone sue over them.
Agreed. You can love someone, while also recognizing their flaws.
But- I think Harry has Meghan on a VERY high pedestal.
Having followed this story closely from the beginning, I think that the bullying allegations are well-established and have been credibly reported from multiple sources, none of which have been sued under Britain's extremely generous libel laws. There are factual reasons to treat allegations of Meghan's bullying of staff as credible.
IIRC Robert Lacey already wrote about a 'fierce and bitter' confrontation between the brothers about the bullying claims. Perhaps this may be the version of the Duke of Sussex of that alleged confrontation.
I’m still not convinced that this isn’t a cultural difference, though. I haven’t read the Valentine Low book yet, but I don’t think I’ve seen other allegations about bullying where the allegations are tied to a specific person. Meghan has had people working for her for a number of years and I don’t recall reading about any of them stating she tended to bully people.
I used to work in PR and corporate communications. This may have been a targeting leak.
My impression is that the brothers were less close after Meghan came on the scene. We actually don’t know how well William even knew Meghan.
Am I the only one surprised to hear these guys call each other “Willy” and “Harold?”
Exactly. Harry seems to blame everything on the media and refuses to accept that the problem could be him, or his wife. There is a reason that the Sussexes haven’t sued over the bullying allegations. It’s also striking how none of their former staff have come out to defend them, or refute the allegations.
We'll see on that. The strategy of silence has been very well-received and positive so far. It may continue.
Well, BP, under the orders of the late Queen herself, refused to publish any of the results of the Inquiry which included any bullying allegations against anybody, the Sussexes, or other royals, any courtiers, any senior staff etc. so nobody is likely to know anything about such allegations, let alone sue over them.
I'm sure that is right. We know that William has a temper, but I've never heard that anyone has accused him of violence. I can see William shouting but the disagreement about Meghan treatment of staff doesn't appear to be the type of thing that would provoke William to violence. After all, William could just tell his grandmother and have staff removed.
It seems inconsistent with prior interviews in which Harry has indicated that he and William are on "different paths" and the relationship is "space." He also stated that "time heals all wounds, hopefully." None of that sounds like William assaulted him. In fact, he seemed angrier at Charles.
In public, Harry was upset when William ignored him at the Commonwealth service and there is the video of William shaking Harry off William's arm. That behavior doesn't seem consistent with being a victim of a violent assault to me.
It's also seems strange that Meghan didn't hint at this earlier. She accused the family of racism - much to Harry's apparent surprise. There have been a lot of leaks from the Susssexes (Finding Freedom).
All this indicates that either it didn't happen, or there is more to the story - like Harry attacked first. I am interested in how William reacts.
She wasn’t there for the conversation about Archie’s skin tone. She heard it second-hand from Harry, so she didn’t exactly accuse anyone of racism.
Yes, I find it very telling that they have not sued Tom Bower for his book, Revenge, or Valentine Low for his book, Courtiers, too. The Sussexes love to sue but they know if they sue these two authors, the truth that comes out may won't be "their truth".