I did feel there was an element of mockery in her tone there.
If she was unprepared for her role then Harry needs to look at himself.
She’s definitely explaining with a mockery tone, she’s playing for the american audience though.
I did feel there was an element of mockery in her tone there.
If she was unprepared for her role then Harry needs to look at himself.
I haven't watched it, but I have watched video clips and read accounts in a couple of different Media outlets.
My first reaction is yawn. They sound like self obsessed teenagers, especially over using the word "like". So far the initial Meeting AND actual Proposal is AGAIN different from what they said initially.
Nice put down about the excitement many felt (I did !) around their Engagement Announcement as an " Orchestrated Reality Show". That is so dismissive, just like when She referred to their Wedding in The Oprah Interview as "a spectacle".
As expected the 'Diana Card' was used a lot too.
How much Harry believes Meghan is SO LIKE her. Good luck pushing that narrative Harry. Nobody else from Diana's Sisters to The Public is buying that.
Subtle "digs" at cold and formal Kate were unsurprising made. And of course the big deal about curtsying to the Queen, upon meeting her, Why ? She seems to love to bring that story up.....again.
Then comparing the luncheon at Royal Lodge to a antiquated banquet at Medieval Times, a Dinner Theater. That is downright bizarre and preposterous.
Royal Lodge isn't thousand year old Windsor Castles St George's Hall, where State Dinners are held, complete with surroundings of gorgeous medieval "finery" all around. IT is a thoroughly updated and luxurious modern Royal Home.
Why even go there with that.
I do find the commentary very interesting and thanks to all for different viewpoints. So far, and this early, I'm not seeing ANYTHING to change minds one way or another. But I do really wonder if The Sussex's think this Netflix Series is helpful to them? I don't and I think they are over saturating the market and interest in them.
That kind of amuses me. Meghan has literally told us she’s smart. Researching and asking questions about the family and job she’s getting would have been the smart thing to do. Particularly when you’re moving to another country and changing careers to do it.
It also reinforces the idea these 2 are more reactionary than thoughtful.
I've just finished Episode 1, and I took notes to share here. I am planning to do the same for other episodes if it's helpful to members.
List of those interviewed in Episode 1 (aside from Harry and Meghan): Lindsay Roth, Meghan's friend. Lucy Fraser, Meghan's friend. Jill Smoller, Meghan's friend. Silver Tree, Meghan's friend. Nacho Figueras, Harry's Polo friend. James Holt, the executive director of Archewell. Afua Hirsh, British journalist and author. Robert Hazell, author, The Role of Monarchy in Modern Democracy. A man called "Nicky" whose last name is not included, who is identified as Harry's childhood friend from Eton. Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, Harry's friend. Abigail Spencer, Meghan's friend (and Suits castmate)
Logistical Information from Episode 1:
The show opens with the information that all interviews were completed by August 2022 and that members of the royal family declined to comment on the content of the series. The second part is currently being disputed by press officials, who claim they were not given the opportunity to comment.
Show Opening credits: Music plays and images are displayed of Prince Charles at his investiture of Prince of Wales, Queen Elizabeth II at her coronation, a baby Harry with Diana, Princess of Wales and a baby Meghan with her mother, Doria Ragland. Then the couple with Archie, press taking photos, William and Harry together as teenagers, the infamous shot of the two of them in the rain under the umbrella looking happy, and some photo booth photos of them embracing and kissing. Several shots of them in California and Lili taking her fist steps, as well as the image of the Queen at Archie's christening. Archie chasing some birds, final shot of the family.
Brief Recap: This episode primarily covered how Harry and Meghan met and their early dating life, including the well-known fact that they had met each other only twice before their trip to Botswana, which is when their relationship became serious, though Harry says he felt he fell in love with her long-distance before that. Harry discusses his early childhood, with a particular focus on his family's relationship with the media. He says they often tried to strike bargains for photo calls with the idea they'd be left alone after, but that they were almost always still pursued. The footage used to illustrate this is the photo call of Harry, William, Beatrice and Eugenie on skiing holiday in Klosters when they were very young. He covers his teen years, and how after Diana died, the press focus turned to him and William and how many of the stories were exaggerated and repeated, such as the "drug shame" story. He covers how he felt after his mother's death- torn between his grief for her and his role in the royal family. He then shares how his former girlfriends were harassed, and how he was afraid he would lose Meghan to the same type of press harassment. When the story of their relationship was about to break, they went out for one last night of anonymous fun, for Halloween, with Eugenie and Jack dressed in costume. Harry was unprepared for the racial undertones of the coverage, and a montage is shown of the headlines from the time, as well as the threats on social media.
Much of this has been extensively covered elsewhere and there's not a lot of new information added in this episode that wasn't already public, aside from the couple's photos and video diaries taken by them during the process of leaving.
Potential spots of controversy: This section is subjective, and contains my own thoughts about what the media might focus on as controversial in this episode. The first is Prince Harry's claim that though the Panorama interview was obtained by deception, it didn't influence what Diana said and her perspective on her life in that interview can be taken as wholly truthful. This contradicts Prince William's public interpretation of the interview, where he stated he feels what she said was substantially influenced by how the interview was obtained. Additionally, there is a direct quote from Harry that said "For so many people in the family especially the men, there can be a temptation or an urge to marry someone who would fit in the mold as opposed to somebody who you perhaps are destined to be with. The difference between making decisions with your head or your heart. And my mom made most of her decisions from her heart and I am my mother's son."It's very possible that this will be interpreted as a dig at William and Catherine's marriage, especially given that later on in the episode, a historian discusses the way the freedoms of members of the royal family are curtailed. When he talks about how their marriages need to be approved by the monarch, a very formal photo of William and Catherine at a royal engagement is shown.
I hope they do not live to regret opening up all their private lives , Pandoras box is now open.
It is now clear why they shared very little of the children over the past few years, it was all being saved up for this.
Some of this is really personal stuff.
Also the niece who claims the palace banned her from the wedding. I do not understand this at all. The couple did not wish to invite the extended royal family who normally go to these things and they were not over ruled for that so why would they be told that a niece who nobody had heard of and could have slipped into the congregation unnoticed had to be rejected.
Her mothers family according to Meghan had handled everything well unlike the fathers side, but they were excluded as well. None of this makes sense.
How many times have you heard actors and actresses talk about the research and preparation they did for a role? But she didn't think any research was necessary to prepare to be a member of one of the British Royal family? It boggles my mind.That kind of amuses me. Meghan has literally told us she’s smart. Researching and asking questions about the family and job she’s getting would have been the smart thing to do. Particularly when you’re moving to another country and changing careers to do it.
So their claim is the palace wouldn’t allow anyone from Meghan’s mother’s side of the family at the wedding except her mother?
This really doesn’t make sense, especially as you say, in light of Harry’s extended family not being invited. Or- that William specifically said his grandmother was flexible about HIS invite list
And she was able to invite people she hardly knew but were world-famous - not only to the wedding but in the choir bit of the chapel... So, it is hard to believe that if Meghan wanted her niece or any other family member to be present, that would have been refused - but I guess, it's easier to explain it that way to her niece?!
I also really react to her mentioning their first dinner date with W&K and how she is always been a hugger and was taken aback that they were not. That the Brits in general are not. Another example of mocking another countries culture. It seems odd to me that someone who prides themselves on being so forward thinking and modern wouldn't understand that hugging someone is a very close form of contact that some people are not comfortable with, and, that kind of contact requires consent. Also, people have boundaries that they create in order to live a balanced life, she seems to be mock those boundaries in the BRF. Relationships take time, and effort, but she comes off as very impatient.
The segment where Meghan talked about meeting the Queen was a little awkward.
Harry continues to be very "woe is me" and continues to prove that he is the heart of the problem. These are two very polarizing people but their trajectory is already waning. Their fans will continue to adore them, their detractors will continue to abhor them, the rest will be relatively uncurious about them if not mildly annoyed.
I agree, however, that there were no bombshells and no direct attacks on the Royal Family and the Palace or the courtiers (I expect that to come up in Part 2). Most of the more controversial talking points actually came not from Harry and Meghan's own voice, but from the (British) guests who appear in the program, e.g., calling the Commonwealth "the Empire 2.0", claiming that Britain is full of "murals glorifying slavery", and just plainly denouncing British society as structurally racist.
A few bits and pieces should be particularly hurtful to the British public though such as Harry speaking negatively (again) of walkabouts, which actually mean a lot to many ordinary people, or Meghan, somewhat contradicting herself, at one point claiming she had never felt what it was like to be treated as a mixed-race person before she moved to the UK, as if her life in LA was a race-blind utopia , which quite frankly defies common knowledge about race relations both in the US and the UK.
The comments about Brexit are just silly. Our non white PM voted for it. So did our black Home Secretary. The reasons for Brexit were various & complex & cannot be distilled down to moronic soundbites.
There is nothing here that is really new or shocking, mostly just rehashed versions of "their truth", but I am expecting the juicy stuff for the second part.
The two parts I kind of take issue with are when she mocks the BRF for their custom of curtseying and formality. I'm not keen on mocking another families, and countries, customs. Imagine someone moving to Japan and complaining how ridiculous all their bowing and formality is.
I also really react to her mentioning their first dinner date with W&K and how she is always been a hugger and was taken aback that they were not. That the Brits in general are not. Another example of mocking another countries culture. It seems odd to me that someone who prides themselves on being so forward thinking and modern wouldn't understand that hugging someone is a very close form of contact that some people are not comfortable with, and, that kind of contact requires consent. Also, people have boundaries that they create in order to live a balanced life, she seems to be mock those boundaries in the BRF. Relationships take time, and effort, but she comes off as very impatient.
Harry continues to be very "woe is me" and continues to prove that he is the heart of the problem. These are two very polarizing people but their trajectory is already waning. Their fans will continue to adore them, their detractors will continue to abhor them, the rest will be relatively uncurious about them if not mildly annoyed.