Lilyflo
Royal Highness
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2018
- Messages
- 1,882
- City
- England
- Country
- United Kingdom
Re: the TV appearance
She's now becoming a car crash herself. What a mess.
She's now becoming a car crash herself. What a mess.
She's now becoming a car crash herself. What a mess.
Re: the TV appearance
She's now becoming a car crash herself. What a mess.
Yes, now the indicator begins to swing from innocent victim - to - exploiting the situation.
Oh, well, perhaps the money she gets out of this will help cushion the fact that she will not earn an income for the next couple of months and is likely to lose her new job as well.
In a couple of weeks she will be forgotten.
So will this accident, Britain has much bigger things to worry about.
BTW how does the system work in Britain, if you are on sick leave very shortly after getting a new job, do you get compensation?
I assume they’ll be talking Prince Philip’s statement too or already done so.
Why is that the media can get in contact with her, but Sandringham and the police can’t?
I feel badly for her, even if her choices of the last few days have not been the best. The British press is very good at luring unsuspecting people in so that they can be built up and then torn back down. She seems to be following that arc now. I don't think the next few days are going to be very pleasant for her, especially if some reporter digs up some irrelevant foible from her personal life.
Since he wasn't injured enough to require immediate medical attention, I'd assume they took it at the scene.
Because the media pay for interviews. Funny what a little money can do.
Well, how much can he tell them when he just emerged from the crash “shaken and shocked?” I would think it’s best to take a statement once one have the time to properly reflect about what happened?
Well, how much can he tell them when he just emerged from the crash “shaken and shocked?” I would think it’s best to take a statement once one have the time to properly reflect about what happened?
Agree, it is absurd for the queen and Philip not to wear seatbelts. It's a safety measure not a nice add on that normal people have to do because the lawmakers liked to make their lives more difficult. The law should apply to all.
But... normally airbags only work if a seat belt is worn, so how can Philip's car have employed the airbag if he wasn't wearing a seat belt?
I do feel sorry for Ms. Fairweather. It seems she has had a rough time of it before the crash happened. However, the impression I got from her interview was that:
1) her lawyer is probably mad at her for talking, especially if her statements about how fast the driver was going and the weather conditions can be contradicted by evidence
2) her lawyer told her that she doesn't have a strong enough case, which is why she accepted payment for the interview.
The sharks are coming for the chum
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...nt-happened-royal-protection-officer-him.html
The passenger said in her interview they saw the Land Rover coming out of the junction some 150 yards away. Shouldn’t they be braking when they saw it pulling out? How can the Kia over turn a heavy armoured Land Rover? This woman better make sure she’s not saying anything inconsistent on her different media interviews or she might ruin her friend’s insurance claims.
Two things the Fail gets wrong. At least the major ones I've noticed.
(...)
2. Philip *was* spotted driving without a seat belt after the accident but they fail to say *where* Philip was spotted at. If Philip was on Sandringham private roads, he can go beltless to his heart's content. If he's on public roads *at all*, he faces the same penalties for not buckling up as anyone would.
It is so difficult to get an elderly person to surrender the car keys!
It's like they consider it giving up on life, or something.