For Catherine's birthday? I think they commented on KP post with their wishes.
Or the intern in the office did. I mean really. They don't use it. Their staff do.
For Catherine's birthday? I think they commented on KP post with their wishes.
It's dreadfully embarrassing to watch, the Disney CEO seems really uncomfortable too.
For Catherine's birthday? I think they commented on KP post with their wishes.
To Kate? SR did posted a birthday comment to her. Its the top one on the KP post.
For Catherine's birthday? I think they commented on KP post with their wishes.
The Tom Bradby article in the The times is the worst thing I have ever read. Royal family members jealous of a Meghan and Harry, of course not The Queen and Phillip. Basically inferring Kate and William jealous and they were forced out. Maybe even particularly Kate. Inferring that the royals leaked it themselves basically. Trust me they wouldn't and have never done such a think ever before. They spike stories sure but never this and then trying to sound balanced by admitting some royals find them difficult. Awful article. To be fair. I am willing to admit, and even suspect, that some courtiers would want to see the back of a Meghan and Harry.
.
The Tom Bradby article in the The times is the worst thing I have ever read. Royal family members jealous of a Meghan and Harry, of course not The Queen and Phillip. Basically inferring Kate and William jealous and they were forced out. Maybe even particularly Kate. Inferring that the royals leaked it themselves basically. Trust me they wouldn't and have never done such a think ever before. They spike stories sure but never this and then trying to sound balanced by admitting some royals find them difficult. Awful article. To be fair. I am willing to admit, and even suspect, that some courtiers would want to see the back of a Meghan and Harry.
Also on the topic of some royals finding them difficult. I bet they do. You just have to notice how Harry hasn't been seen with any of his cousins, apart from borrowing Eugenie's houe. Although public understanding is that Harry has always been very close to Eugenie and maybe William is c.over to the Phillips cousins. Who he is seen with a bit. Also I am betting people were jealous a bit. It is a natural enough emotion. Doesn't mean they were a lady macbeth about it or were anything but civil.
Absurd. No one in the family wanted this public until the details were locked down.
And- there’s no way William and Kate really wanted them out. They just lost their primary support going forward. I think a more likely scenario is Harry and Meghan wanted to do things that aren’t the BRF way- and were told just that. It fits with their wishes/demands website.
I can well imagine some royals- and staff- find the Sussexes difficult. Their behavior from the interview to the handling of this decision alone makes that easy to envision. Forget what’s been going on behind closed doors.
Even if a royal didn't leak it, a courtier could have. I mean that happens all the time in institutions and there BRF has a history of that sort of thing happening.
It's dreadfully embarrassing to watch, the Disney CEO seems really uncomfortable too.
Or the intern in the office did. I mean really. They don't use it. Their staff do.
Ego and such don't always common sense make. I am not saying William and Kate wanted them out but we also have no idea what went down or if cool heads have led in the recent past. Again, royal brother fighting and back cutting is basically the norm looking at history.
Again, people will believe the worst of whichever royal they dislike or doubt and the best of the ones they do like. IMO the truth is probs more in the middle.
oh boy. there is a thread about the Sussexes on another site. I stated my opinion that I wasn't surprised at their actions. disappointed, yes. I immediately thought of the Duke of Windsor...hardly the same thing, but the thought was there. and I can't imagine that thought hasn't occurred to Her Majesty. and the abdication was a big deal to the Royals. granted neither Harry or Meghan are poor. but living in a certain "style", takes money. Harry has never wanted for anything. this would be a big adjustment. and I can't see the Queen letting them trade on their titles. if they want to walk away, then fine. no titles, no money from the firm.
Huh? What he going to pull her citizenship. This is getting silly.
If I were the Queen (there's a fun game) I'd be suggesting:
-they will continue to have funding for UK life and UK office (which I imagine will be much reduced)
-when in UK and doing public duties they will be able to use HRH Duke/Duchess of Sussex
-they will have usual royal police protection in UK
-probably wouldn't undertake overseas visits but will support patronages in the UK
-meet cost of 6 return flights from wherever they settle to UK each year (Trooping, Christmas, Easter and handful of others)
-Charles to provide six figure amount as personal living allowance (but much less than what they get now and not listed under official expenditure but from Charles own private spending)
-Harry and Meghan to use personal funds to pay for a North America home
-for anything other than approved events (requiring approval from BP) they will use either Mr & Mrs Mountbatten-Windsor or Mr & Mrs Sussex (their choice of which) only
-NDA preventing them talking about RF and its workings
-Couple meet North America security costs privately
It's dreadfully embarrassing to watch, the Disney CEO seems really uncomfortable too.
Harry has net worth of 25 million and Meghan 5 million. I actually read not to long ago his net worth was 53 million. So, I don't understand them wanting to be financially independent. With 30 million dollars plus between them, they are not hurting for money. They are already financially independent. Harry's assets are inherited and cannot be taken away.
In Canada, they won't have to rush out and find jobs. Not with 30 million dollars plus between them.
Agreed. We don’t know what’s gone down. I’m sure it’s complicated. It’s family and the family business intermingled. And William is the future head of it.
I admire a lot of what Meghan and Harry have done. They’ve done some truly wonderful things with their endeavors. I thought they got a lot of undeserved criticism right and left.
But- I don’t have a high opinion of how they’ve handled things publicly starting with the interview. That really has me seeing them differently.
Wow the video of Harry at the Lion King premiere is sooo bad. He is clearly trying to use what I presume was an official royal event to get work for Meghan. I know the money from her voiceover went to charity but the scene of Harry networking for a "private job" at an official event won't help them now I don't think.
I'm not the biggest fan of the DM but the video is here on their site https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-tout-Meghan-Markle-Disney-voiceover-job.html
If anyone finds it anywhere else I'll happily change the link to another
I think it’s more notable that they decided to go public with their decision and their wishes/demands list right at Kate’s birthday without talking to any of the involved parties first and working together. They got blindsided instead.
I’d like to think there was at least an apology for the obvious damper they would have put on her birthday, but I guess that depends on just how poor relations are between them all now.
And this decision impacts no one in the short and long term more than William and Kate. Harry and Meghan were supposed to be their primary support. That is gone.
I’ve said it before- if they want a different role and are just miserable, best to move on for all involved. It’s not good for anyone. But my primary sympathy is with everyone else dealing with the fallout- from family to staff.
And Meghan pointedly leaving the U.K. after the announcement, not facing any of her family/bosses in person for the meeting about her and Harry’s future doesn’t leave a good impression at all.
I feel like people overestimate how much money $30-35million actually is, especially when it would be needed to fund the lifestyle Harry has grown up with/is accustomed to, and Meghan has entered after her engagement.
Should they need to pay for their own security, purchase a new home/furniture, pay taxes, etc - $30-35 million wouldn't last more than a decade without the need to have a source of income.
This is an incredible sum of money, sure. But in reality, it's not even that much - between security cost (around 1 million per year), buying a new house, taxes, probably even paying rent on Frogmore Cottage and day to day life it's not the kind of money that will be able to support their lifestyle. Not to mention they'd probably like to leave Archie and his potential sibling with some kind of money. Roughly estimating, Prince Charles may be giving them around 2.5 million pounds per year (5.1 million in 2019 divided between Cambridges and Sussexes) for their expenses. It's possible that they already started using their own money to fund their North America team, the website and everything else connected to it.Harry has net worth of 25 million and Meghan 5 million. I actually read not to long ago his net worth was 53 million. So, I don't understand them wanting to be financially independent. With 30 million dollars plus between them, they are not hurting for money. They are already financially independent. Harry's assets are inherited and cannot be taken away.
In Canada, they won't have to rush out and find jobs. Not with 30 million dollars plus between them.
The Cambridge jealousy angle is not new.
Half hour ago on CNN, Victoria Arbiter stated the leak from the Sun triggered the Sussex announcement and the queen and Charles were well aware of the Sussexes' plans. She also said racism, covert and overt, was part of the media coverage. The one shoulder dress comparison between Meghan and Kate was used. VA is going to get grief for this.
I think all proxys from both sides need to shut the pie holes at this stage.
According to People mag, in November Meghan visited at Frogmore with an extremely high profile US politician who also happens to have a foundation that bears her surname. At the time I wrote this off as Meghan naturally wanting to rub shoulders with high-profile people.
If, and its a BIG if, she took advice from this particular person, heaven help her. If you don't know who it is, just take a wild guess and look it up.
I cant find an online reference on anything from the Obamas---can you give us a news source. Thanks
I feel like people overestimate how much money $30-35million actually is, especially when it would be needed to fund the lifestyle Harry has grown up with/is accustomed to, and Meghan has entered after her engagement.
Should they need to pay for their own security, purchase a new home/furniture, pay taxes, etc - $30-35 million wouldn't last more than a decade without the need to have a source of income.
They will make millions more on top of what they already have. What I mean, is that there is not an immediate need. And I highly doubt Price Charles and the Queen will cut them off totally. I bet they will pay for the security themselves. They are still family. We need to remember that. And the Queen loves Harry and Archie.
Bob Iger seemed stunned - and no wonder. Using a Royal event to get Meghan work? So that means their donation to the charity was a way to make this less tawdry? It didn’t work. Is Harry’s main job to tout for his wife?
I never heard of Jessica Mulroney until Meghan got engaged even though I live in the same city. Her husband Ben is the son of a former Prime Minster and is/was was a very minor media personality.
I don't think there will be much of a backlash because most people here don't pay any attention to her.
I agree with you—on all points.
I started being uncomfortable with things around the time of Archie’s birth although things were a bit off before that, and nothing was quite right again, but I tried to ignore it. Then that African tour and the interview were just off-putting.