It means they have been cut off financially. I don’t think this is voluntary. I think they were asked to leave.
It is very odd and unusual. Royals may grumble and say that they didn't ask for the job.. but they rarely give it up....
It means they have been cut off financially. I don’t think this is voluntary. I think they were asked to leave.
That is crazy. I can’t think of anyone so high up in the royal hierarchy ( other than King Edward VIII of course) renouncing his/her title in recent times and, when it happens, it is because of some serious external factor.
I hope that, one day, what really happened behind the scenes is fully clarified and revealed.
I get the feeling this was not rushed. It seemed they really reflected on things and clearly is a signal of how bad things have got within the family if they felt this was the only option for them. Clearly they think the risk is worth it.
Their website answers a lot of question including why they turned down the KP apartment in favor of Frogmore. I clearly were thinking far in advance about their finances. And honestly we barely see then outside of their duties. We never saw them during this break.
I think that is what they want.
I don't think this is really about their son. Of course we are not privy to lots of details and it might be a small part of the equation; but Archie so far lived a fairly normal although extremely privileged life; and he was not expected to perform royal duties. He will most likely still attend private education etc.
Live on his personal money left to him and her own money presumably. Heck, He can get a job if need be! Plenty of minor Royals and Royal relations have them.
But if they happen to seriously think they can sustain their current lifestyle indefinitely on private money they may be in for shock. And for sure using Royal connections for projects, philanthropy and charity should stop.
Indeed they might, but the BFR has always valued [and expected] 'Duty' in return for the bounty and privilege Royalty confers..
Put yourself outside that, and you become 'beyond the pale'..
It is very odd and unusual. Royals may grumble and say that they didn't ask for the job.. but they rarely give it up....
Interesting. Apparently by quitting their roles as senior royals they plan to pick and choose instead of being required to provide somewhat equal access. They have long liked to be in control and I assume that's part of what attracts them in becoming semi-private royals.Their own little royal reporter has some insight into how Meghan and Henry plan to work with the press and media in 2020;
I’m happy for them. This is clearly what they wanted, and I’m happy they’ll be free from the press strain.
"After many months of reflection and internal discussions, we have chosen to make a transition this year in starting to carve out a progressive new role within this institution. We intend to step back as ‘senior’ members of the Royal Family and work to become financially independent, while continuing to fully support Her Majesty the Queen...
We look forward to sharing the full details of this exciting next step in due course, as we continue to collaborate with Her Majesty The Queen, The Prince of Wales, The Duke of Cambridge and all relevant parties. Until then, please accept our deepest thanks for your continued support."
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/monarchalypse-harry-meghan-step-back-senior-royals
What? So, they want to continue to "support the Queen" and "continue to collaborate with Her Majesty The Queen, The Prince of Wales, The Duke of Cambridge and all relevant parties" but be independent?
Sorry, sounds half baked to me!
More like: We want to live off out titles... A new Märtha Luise of Norway thingy incoming...
Okay...maybe I am missing something...are they renouncing their Royal status or their Royal duties...or both?
Does Harry intend to be simply Henry Mountbatten-Windsor??
No - it seems like they're keeping the titles, but losing the money and gaining free will to do whatever they want, however they want, wherever they want.Okay...maybe I am missing something...are they renouncing their Royal status or their Royal duties...or both?
Does Harry intend to be simply Henry Mountbatten-Windsor??
I think it was rushed in that they haven’t even been married two years yet, and Archie is only 8 months old. A tremendous amount of change has happened in Meghan’s life in a very short period of time. I have absolutely no doubt that it’s been horrible for her and they felt like something needed to give, but I think they’d have had an easier time just trying to fly under the radar for a year or so (doing minimal engagements) and then assessing where they were and what they wanted for the future.
It’s tough to make decisions under pressure and mental duress. I hope they’re happier but I think this is going to be more difficult on them then staying would have been.
I hope someone explains to them that if they take Duchy money, they are not financially independent. I wonder if the Prince of Wales when King Charles ascend will continue to fund them.
Also, good luck to the Cambridges because they are going to have to work hard until their children are working for the Crown.
I don't think they realise that to be a big player in charitable spaces, you also need to have big money (e.g Gates, Zuckerberg, Lucas/Hobson etc type of money). The Obama family does well because they have accumulated 8 years of goodwill and an address book filled with actual billionaires. Can we say the same for the Sussexes?
On the other hand, I am happy for them. From the documentary you could tell they were not doing ok and as the Duchess of Sussex said, in life, you must thrive and not only survive (and I 100% agree with that).
Okay...maybe I am missing something...are they renouncing their Royal status or their Royal duties...or both?
Does Harry intend to be simply Henry Mountbatten-Windsor??
It actually doesn't explain the 95% of the money - which, as stated in their own website, comes from the Duchy of Cornwall. And there's no word about "becoming independent" from the Duchy, they're talking just about The Sovereign Grant.
Might help explain about the money.
I don’t think any of this came as shock to queen of Charles. I think they had the full suppport. I can see Charles wanting his son and daughter in law to enjoy the freedom and spread their wings when they still have the time. When Charles is king and even William until George and his siblings are much older Harry will likely need to step back up. Unless the York’s are invited to become working royals as William will need support.
More here on Sussex Royal website. They want to be financially independent from the Sovereign Grant but say they will still use Frogmore Cottage and carry out official overseas visits paid for by the Sovereign Grant so that part is a little confusing.
Do any other members of the Royal Family hold a title and earn an income?
Yes, there is precedent for this structure and applies to other current members of the Royal Family who support the monarch and also have full time jobs external to their commitment to the monarchy.
It actually doesn't explain the 95% of the money - which, as stated in their own website, comes from the Duchy of Cornwall. And there's no word about "becoming independent" from the Duchy, they're talking just about The Sovereign Grant.
Would this be somewhat akin to the situation of Princess Madeleine of Sweden?
Have they now become completely....nuts?Just saw the news on CNN. I am shocked.