People ripped them for the $2.4M. So they say they will pay it back and make their own money instead... and people still upset.
We have some words from “the horses mouth”, so to speak.
Henry at a Sentebale event this evening.
Henry making it almost crystal clear in the speech that he has made the decision to step back.
There have been the three that you mentioned, that is not several in my book. The generations photos that William and George have been part of in the past were christening photos and photos commemorating key birthdays/anniversaries, and yet this one was billed as welcoming the new decade. Now that I think about it, and knowing that the Sussex drama was playing out behind the scenes, I can actually see why this seemingly innocuous photo could have been interpreted as a circle the wagons / "here are the ones that matter" move by Harry.There have been several “four generations” photos taken in the past few years- at George’s christening, for the stamp when George was around 2, and now with the one taken at Christmas. I think that it’s just media ridiculousness that Harry was upset about it. His family wasn’t even in the UK at the time the photo was released, and none of the other grandchildren or great-grandchildren were included so it wasn’t like Archie was being singled out by being excluded.
It will be paid back by Charles....
He seems to be putting the blame on his family rather than taking any responsibility for their own actions in this drama. I would have more respect if he had just kept his mouth shut instead of playing the victim yet again.
People ripped them for the $2.4M. So they say they will pay it back and make their own money instead... and people still upset.
Harry said he made the final decision. He confirmed they wanted to serve but without taking public money. He was denied. Likely was told you either full time royal or not one at all. He made his choice.
I'm sorry but I really hate how Harry uses his dead mother to gain sympathy whenever he's in 'trouble'. He isn't the only person to have lost a parent when young. Yes, it was tragic, but it cheapens her legacy to 'wheel' her out so to speak in this way.
I completely understand his desire to retreat from the glare of the media and I would be fully 'on his side' if his actions lined up with his words....but they don't. IF it is the media attention that is the driving factor of this decision, why on earth is his new job to basically become a celebrity? He's choosing to stay in the public eye... If he announced his decision to step back to go and work at the head office of a charity I would find his claims much more sincere and believable
Dan Wootton has a new “exclusives”
So the once Fab Four have called a truce? But not with Charles. Also HMQ is leaning on Andrew. He on a roll. So many sources chatty.
Dan Wootton has a new “exclusives”
So the once Fab Four have called a truce? But not with Charles. Also HMQ is leaning on Andrew. He on a roll. So many sources chatty.
Dan Wootton has a new “exclusives”
So the once Fab Four have called a truce? But not with Charles. Also HMQ is leaning on Andrew. He on a roll. So many sources chatty.
Harry said he made the final decision. He confirmed they wanted to serve but without taking public money. He was denied. Likely was told you either full time royal or not one at all. He made his choice.
According to one (probably unreliable) source, Meghan is apparently still interested in British citizenship. In that case she better come back to Britain within a few weeks (given that they also spent some time abroad over the summer - and not counting their official visits) or the count will start again.
Yes he would know the history but that does not mean that Harry agreed with the practice and could have considered it an anachronism. I may be wrong about this but when I was rethinking my initial dismissal of Harry not being pleased about the four generations photo, the thought occurred to me that there were no generations pictures taken when Diana was alive. Again I am not 100% sure but I have done a couple google image searches, and other one from William's christening photo which of course Harry did not exist for, I have not come across a generations photos released during Diana's lifetime.
The real question in all this is who is Dan Wooton's deep throat??!!
To be honest I hope we can now have a few weeks without hearing so much about the Sussexes, I hope they go to Canada and as talks about the finer details will still be ongoing they keep a low profile.
I'd be amazed (but delighted) if W&H have truly made up if the feud is as bad as reported, or is this a way to cover up the fact its been rubbish all along? Maybe now H&M will be out the country all parties feel its easier to appear friendly with the benefit of thousands of miles between them meaning they are unlikely to have to see each other very often.
I just hope this is the first and last speech Harry makes on the issue and he's not going to trout out the same message each time keeping the story going. Decision made, deal done, speech made now zip it for a bit.
I can't see how Meghan can still get British citizenship if they are going to spend significant time in Canada and possibly USA. The numbers just don't add up.
That is not what we've been hearing in the past few weeks. Harry was seen as the one closer to Charles vis a vis William, but I never thought that adult Harry had a strong bond with Charles. There were reports that Meghan influenced Harry to be closer to Charles, which I can buy into. It seems like whatever closeness that they had has fallen by the wayside. As I mentioned previously, Harry was reportedly not happy that his father sided with the Queen when it came to getting his own court. It seems like the Queen can do no wrong in Harry's eyes, even when she does something that he does not like, but Charles, William and others do not enjoy the same privilege.That is odd . It is exactly the opposite of what we were hearing, i.e. that Harry was distancing himself from William and getting closer to Charles .
Where has he said he intends to become a celebrity? He just said publically he intends to continue a life of service.
Why don't you just give him a chance to do something before you come down on him and make these sorts of baseless claims.
LaRae
It's nice to hear Harry talking tonight about how he loves the UK and acknowledges all the affection and support that he's had over the years.
Exactly, and not for one year but for 3 years in a row. So, unless their home base is the UK and they only spend a few months in North America (or anywhere else) it is not feasible.Don’t you have to spend something like 9 months out of the year in the UK to qualify? From what it sounds like, they won’t be spending nearly that much time there, even though they claim that they will split their time between the UK and North America.
I’m very curious where they will end up settling. None of them is a Canadian citizen, but it sounds like that’s where they want to be. The US is always an option since both Meghan and Archie are US citizens.
It’s nice, but I wouldn’t have expected anything less honestly. I’m sure it was sincere. It was also good PR, which he needs.
That is not what we've been hearing in the past few weeks. Harry was seen as the one closer to Charles vis a vis William, but I never thought that adult Harry had a strong bond with Charles. There were reports that Meghan influenced Harry to be closer to Charles, which I can buy into. It seems like whatever closeness that they had has fallen by the wayside. As I mentioned previously, Harry was reportedly not happy that his father sided with the Queen when it came to getting his own court. It seems like the Queen can do no wrong in Harry's eyes, even when she does something that he does not like, but Charles, William and others do not enjoy the same privilege.
Harry is upset with Charles, but wants him to fund their lifestyle?
That’s what some people said 11 days ago....
We’ll see- I hope I am happily surprised.
I’m honestly surprised that Harry and Meghan thought they could be half in and half out.
Harry is upset with Charles, but wants him to fund their lifestyle?
I remember him having to retract one of his stories (was it the car park story?), but I think that his overall hit ratio is pretty decent. When he broke the story about the tiara which got the ball rolling on the negative Meghan stories, he was over-the-top with his negative view of Meghan and my take away is that you have to read his stuff with a critical eye, but I for one think that he has good sources. Bear in mind that a top-notch source may feed false information in order to further their own agenda.So many exclusives. Personally I don’t believe it. In all his many many MANY stories, only like one has been close. It was Canada. Others actually went as far as been retracted. So right now I think he just building off the Canada scoop with other nonsense.
Yep I came across the same photos in my Google search. My original comment was that, other than William's christening photos, that no generational photos were released in Diana's lifetime, and apparently your search seems to confirm my search.Not before Diana’s death but in a very quick Google search I found a formal photo from 2000 of the Queen Mother, the Queen, Charles & William and from 2003, a formal photo of the Queen, Charles and William.
If the generational photo of the Queen and her three next heirs was an issue for Harry, then he is an idiot.