Toledo
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2005
- Messages
- 3,170
- City
- Amsterdam, Upstate NY
- Country
- United States
Re 'heroic stand' against royal 'racism'
OMG! They will be receiving an award for a line of questions from the Queen of USA Tabloid TV, Oprah, who is no better than Rupert Murdoch's tabloid empire. Oprah led them, like a lawyer cornering a witness, to give her material for a bombshell she needed for the show.
How did Oprah got involved with them? She was part of a celebrity wedding guest wish list to make good TV in the USA. They didn't even know the bride, per wedding guest George Clooney. That led to reciprocate with an exclusive Oprah used to put emphasis the race issue, which here in the USA is always a hot topic. And I agree with the above comments, it produced defamation against an entire family that, from day one, welcomed Meghan into their group and assigned her same duties as other working royals.
I followed their story from the start and the racism in the press had the Murdoch machinery behind it, fueling at most in his media empire, from the UK to USA and Australia. I hope they say that out loud in the open during award ceremony instead of using King Charles III as the target practice for their 'heroic stand' against royal 'racism'
This is going to escalate after the TV show and the book come out in December and January respectively. And it bears repeating that the Kennedy Foundation Board, thirsty for free publicity, is placing them at the same level as major political and philanthropy figures for their 'heroic stand' against royal 'racism' done on a TV interview show with Oprah leading the witness for a nice TV quote or two.
Robert Kennedy Jr., a prominent member of the Kennedy family, also stated his opposition to them on this award. He included in his remarks past few days their other claims on their non-profit tax heaven charities that are still, to this day, not documented since they were established.
This is bad and defamatory toward King Charles III, at least according to Google:
“A claim of defamation requires the following five elements:
(1) publication;
(2) falsity.
(3) the person must act with knowledge or reckless disregard as to the falsity on a matter concerning a public official, or at least negligently on a matter concerning a private person.
(4) actual damages; and
(5) statement must be defamatory. "
I'm out of here till the next article.
OMG! They will be receiving an award for a line of questions from the Queen of USA Tabloid TV, Oprah, who is no better than Rupert Murdoch's tabloid empire. Oprah led them, like a lawyer cornering a witness, to give her material for a bombshell she needed for the show.
How did Oprah got involved with them? She was part of a celebrity wedding guest wish list to make good TV in the USA. They didn't even know the bride, per wedding guest George Clooney. That led to reciprocate with an exclusive Oprah used to put emphasis the race issue, which here in the USA is always a hot topic. And I agree with the above comments, it produced defamation against an entire family that, from day one, welcomed Meghan into their group and assigned her same duties as other working royals.
I followed their story from the start and the racism in the press had the Murdoch machinery behind it, fueling at most in his media empire, from the UK to USA and Australia. I hope they say that out loud in the open during award ceremony instead of using King Charles III as the target practice for their 'heroic stand' against royal 'racism'
This is going to escalate after the TV show and the book come out in December and January respectively. And it bears repeating that the Kennedy Foundation Board, thirsty for free publicity, is placing them at the same level as major political and philanthropy figures for their 'heroic stand' against royal 'racism' done on a TV interview show with Oprah leading the witness for a nice TV quote or two.
Robert Kennedy Jr., a prominent member of the Kennedy family, also stated his opposition to them on this award. He included in his remarks past few days their other claims on their non-profit tax heaven charities that are still, to this day, not documented since they were established.
This is bad and defamatory toward King Charles III, at least according to Google:
“A claim of defamation requires the following five elements:
(1) publication;
(2) falsity.
(3) the person must act with knowledge or reckless disregard as to the falsity on a matter concerning a public official, or at least negligently on a matter concerning a private person.
(4) actual damages; and
(5) statement must be defamatory. "
I'm out of here till the next article.
Last edited: