It did until the breeze took undue liberties however, the beautifully styled and textured front looked truly lovely under the hat (Noooo, give it back to your mother) okay I'm not a fan of the hat but it did its job beautifully. That the rest of her hair got windblown is a learning lesson for both she and her hairdresser . . . updo or stronger hair product and spray.
I think you are forgetting that this is a "fashion" thread and when we critique a woman's ensemble their shape is a major part of how they dress. A super slim woman is going to vanish in a sheath when she turns sideways while a fuller-figured woman has an edge. We come in a wide array of sizes and shapes and the trick we are looking for is when, in this case, Princess Catharina-Amalia finds her sweet spot. When it all comes together to become her own "style".
Let us be honest, Amalia definitely has a fuller figure and that means two big things. Firstly, she has a decolletage that will enable her to wear the most beautiful historic necklaces without having to shorten them. (Both HMQM and QEII were also similarly blessed) and she is long-legged and that is going to give her the stature required to wear them and a lot of other jewellery besides. I am looking forward to this young woman stepping out and knocking our socks off.
I am not a fan of body shaming as at eighteen I was short and, to put it politely, my body had yet to mature fully and I couldn't find a dress off the rack that fitted both my hips, bust and dress or pants length. To say that Amalia is fuller figured is not, and I repeat not body shaming. I think we have learned a lot over the years about what is or is not appropriate to say and from what I have seen, people on the board seem to pitch their fashion critiques to the individual concerned and not the size 0 runway.
