Duke of Marmalade
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- May 19, 2007
- Messages
- 14,885
- City
- Frankfurt am Main
- Country
- Germany
As one poster had already been saying, it's easy to say it in theory, however when it really happens, it's really like taking away the things you really love and are very much accustomed to. I don't think Elena had much an issue. She was always being said to be the least ambitious member in the family.
If that was true, the relationship would have been difficult from the start but it only went cold in around summer 2007.
I don't think Letizia had anything to do with Zarzuela's decision on removing Inaki's business, she doesn't have much voice there IMO. My point was that the previously close relationship between Cristina and Felipe had turned cold, why didn't people ask 'why' ? The press has only been interested at the 'wars' between women, those trivial gossips said by them likely wouldn't have caused a close relationship between brother and sister turning cold (I have a brother myself too).
I know the final decision was definitely from JC to remove Inaki's business in Spain, however Cristina could be disappointed if her brother hadn't supported Inaki along the way IMO. Now more people can see it was a wise decision, but at that time, not everyone involved could think rationally, Inaki was said to be extremely angry about the decision in the book written by JC's friend collecting 16 letters written by JC to Felipe when he was studying at Georgetown.
Felipe will have as little say in this as any other family member - its the King who will decide and nobody will dare to turn against his decision.
And even if Cristina was angry because of Felipe's behaviour, why turn against her sister in law and not against her brother?
I still believe its something personal between both women, maybe a clash of character after the gloves came off (Cristina behaviour almost came across as rude at some point), nothing to do with Inakis business interests.