sirhon11234
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2006
- Messages
- 2,453
- City
- New York
- Country
- United States
Whats the difference between a diadem and a tiara.
Mr Munn's bible "Tiaras a History of Splendour" gives the rundown. In short, they are symbols of status and/or designations of rank, going back to ancient times and various civilisations. What was once a plain laurel wreath is now a diamond-encrusted gem. In the Court of Louis XIV fantasy and extravagence ruled, and the fashionable outrageous piled-high hair styles of that time and later were the ideal stage-setting for extensive decoration. Fashion, wealth and the desire to display status combined with the development of specialised craftsmen with an eye for design have given us the wonderful works of art (and less successful pieces) we admire today.ortino said:Does anybody know how tiaras came about? What was their mane ahem main, purpose? And how did they evolve to such elegance, what w/ diamonds and other precious stones.
A very broad definition, here. The terms may be interchangeable, for example the Papal tiara is not a "tiara" as we understand the word today.sirhon11234 said:Whats the difference between a diadem and a tiara.
sirhon11234 said:Whats the difference between a diadem and a tiara.
Well, according to the book it's still owned by Princess Alice's family.HRHAmy said:Thank you Acid Rain, do you know if this one is still in the family or if it was sold? It's beautiful.
1. "The diamond-set tiara given by Queen Victoria to Princess Alice as a wedding present in 1862."
Wow! This is a truely unique tirara. Oh how I hope that somehwere, somehow, this has survived. It is one of the truely exceptional tiaras that I have seen. :w00t2: :w00t2:mims111 said:This tiara is so lovely!
http://www.royal-magazin.de/russia/alexandra-romanov-aquamarine.htm
Dear Elsa M, you had maid a great job to to give us pics of all the tiaras of Royal Spain Family.Elsa M. said:Here are the main Spanish tiaras.
Thomas, you need a cup of iced tea. As has been explained by Kimebear, the Poltimore was never a "Royal Family heirloom", and even if the Queens you mentioned had set up family foundations, Margaret's Poltimore, as her private property, would not have been included.Thomas Parkman said:I could skin the BRF, including Queens Mary, Queen Mum and ERII for not setting up a foundation to keep all of this massive jewelry collection intact and for the use of the Royal Family. These jewels are part of the heritage and dignity of the whole British nation.
It will, however, be forever synonymous with Princess Margaret. Her style, charisma. call it what you will!Warren said:the Poltimore was never a "Royal Family heirloom".
Unlike the the other possible half dozen. Not one of them will have the quantity "X" of the Poltimore!Warren said:There are still possibly another half dozen tiaras of truly Royal provenance in the possession of Viscount Linley and Lady Sarah Armstrong-Jones.
Warren said:There are still possibly another half dozen tiaras of truly Royal provenance in the possession of Viscount Linley and Lady Sarah Armstrong-Jones.
There are some pics in the Princess Margaret Jewels thread.LadyK said:Which ones do they have? (can you post links to pictures?)
mims111 said:This tiara is so lovely!
http://www.royal-magazin.de/russia/alexandra-romanov-aquamarine.htm
Current whereabouts unknown.samgee said:which countrys royal fmaily has this one?? its beautiful!!