Search results

I think it’s about the enclosure to which they have tickets. The Royal, The Queen Ann and so on. I’m not sure, though.

Brilliant photo and brilliant message.

Search engine optimization.

And William and Harry were calling Charles “Papa” when they were little.

And starting with a photo for King Charles: https://www.instagram.com/p/C8ROJxrNau_/?igsh=cHh3aHNtb3Y5cTRr

I looked up the time of publication on Nacho’s instagram account. It was between three and four in the morning in UK. And evening/late evening in America, depending on the location. I am convinced they hoped the press will pick it up before the start of TTC and that the story will go hand in...

I think it’s the post from a few weeks ago.

I have a very strong suspicion that he was given hints about when to put it out. It’s a recurrent coincidence that a lot of Meghan’s advertisments happen just when there’s something in the RF calendar. Of course, it’s just coincidence.

Meghan released some new goodies to her friends, raspberry jam and dog biscuits. Literally during the TTC...

They need content. The statements that were made since January were quite clear for me. I don’t think there’s anyone nowadays who expects cancer to be straightforward.

I think people are too much in a black or white way of thinking. When she said she was going to be ok she didn’t give a verdict, but a hope.

My father was a military. It was always for the time being. Yet a very stable home.

I think it’s about everyone’s own definition. Showing one’s back, in my opinion, it’s an evening thing, and in any way not for a church service. To have the bride do it I consider vulgar. It’s not like she couldn’t afford a second dress for the party. Again, it’s just my personal opinion. No...

[.....]And that’s RAVEC’s business to assess. It’s one thing to say that I’ve seen people affirming their dislike, it’s completely different to have the competence to discern what is threatening and what is just lip work. As for agressiveness, there are lunatics in both camps. I have a huge...

If that’s the worst, a little idiot posting online, and who was already jailed, then I understand better why RAVEC is working on a case by case basis. Harry himself made some allegations that were from the category “truth may vary”. So I’m not going to take his demand at face value.

and that’s why RAVEC found that bespoke solution, assessing every visit individually. Threats might be temporary or resolved. As for his visa, at the moment that they’ve moved to US (spring 2020), they were in the one year to review, so it’s only logic that he had that type of visa. It would be...

Prince Harry got permission to appeal the ruling in his suit regarding his security. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7228zd319lo.amp

Without doubt. As an American citizen I believe she didn’t need a tourist visa when it all began. As long as she left UK every three months she should have been good. And then she got engaged.

Let’s cool down before the thread is closed again. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and they can use what arguments they see fit to sustain said opinion.

DM has the nasty habit of publishing anodine facts in an unflattering light. But most of the time they are using real facts. And the other tabloids too. There are so many examples in the past.

They do have a communication something for UK and Europe, don’t they? Charlie what’s-his-name. The one who gave that statement that The King is too busy to see Harry when he came for St. Paul Thanksgiving service? LE Found it, Charlie Gibson. https://archive.ph/JUpFW

Neither does People about Lili’s birthday party. The press writes about them. Readers are interested enough to click on the articles. Revenue is generated. Nothing to do with the true truth. Parts of the press cater to their fans, other parts cater to those who dislike them.

I agree, I think most of this is pragmatic. I think that maybe Andrew wants to leave the lease to one of his daughters, and a new lease will not be as advantageous as the current one. As I understand, even if there are conditions in the lease to maintain the lodge, not fulfilling those...

Here’s the article from The Times https://archive.ph/RGJNM

He has a lease, signed in 2003, I think, for a long period, something like 75 years, I don’t remember exactly. It is the property of the Crown Estate, not private property.