Search results

“He also said questions had been raised about why “three or four associates of the Duke of Sussex” had not given evidence in the case against MGN.” What goes for the goose goes for the ganter also.

The navy dress at the TTC 2018, the beige caftan at the dinner in Morroco, the light grey ensemble for the Thanksgiving service for the Jubilee, the handbag when getting off the jet when coming back from NY.

Yeah, but it might be possible that at the time of his entry in US in March 2020 that he would have still carried some form of diplomatic status as a royal who could represent the monarch. His/their status has changed in February 2021. For almost a year he was still a potential representative of...

I love it when opinion pieces leave out details that don’t align with the opinion. In this one, Harry himself denied that “the royal family is racist” or something. But let’s continue with this line, it serves well. Also, when acknowledging that all married ins are subject to press abuse, let’s...

And another one with the book Harry has offered to him: Spare.

Then why not make a formal complaint about that? And we know the answer: because the articles themselves didn’t write anything illegal. (That was the first time I’ve heard of her. Whatever he’s speaking about in that hotheaded statement didn’t appear in the “big guns” press. But that’s off topic.)

On one hand, I wouldn’t put media AND social media in the same category. On the other hand, the fact that there were negative articles about Meghan doesn’t mean there weren’t positive articles, too. It’s very healthy to have both kind. My question from this idea of him that he initiated this...

I presume that it can happen if there’s a scandal du jour that involves that person.

“ In claiming such stories were “hurtful, mean and cruel”, the Duke laid bare his deep sense of unhappiness – not just with the media – but a life he seems now to wish was lived a different way.”...

If he left LA Sunday night it means he is in London on Monday. And he stayed in instead of being in court??

They either’ve been refused the information or didn’t receive an answer in the delay stated in that freedom of information act, I forgot which it is.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12095151/Harry-Meghan-involved-near-catastrophic-car-chase-New-York-spokesman-claims.html Interesting mention: “ In common with other websites, MailOnline published agency pictures of Harry and Meghan for a few hours this morning. The agency pictures...

“ The BBC has not been able to independently verify the details.”

Apparently NYPD denies any calls about any chase. Who knows? What I’ve seen on TMZ is them sitting in ancab in traffic and a pedestrian taking photos. No police, no chase. Who knows, but it smells fishy.

Today was a hearing for his suit against Home Office. The article from the telegraph: https://archive.ph/iT5jO

With the new details about Diaz and Paltrow I lost any doubt that it was a PR move.

Unfortunate coincidence or a planned one, it matters very little. For a lot of people, the optics are that this was a response to the videos and photographs released over the weekend by the RF.

He last wore a morning suit nine months ago that we know about, at HLM’s funeral. It was a fine morning suit, I don’t see the need for a new one (and less elegant, IMO). Seeing how he showed the shirt when he went to the hearing last month, for me there’s no doubt that he has an ongoing deal...

Mirroring the Oprah interview?

I’ll never understand in what way they were treated unfairly. All I’ve seen were exceptions that were favourable to them. And I don’t understand how such a trial would solve the supposed unfairness.

Some observers (found on instagram but don’t remember who) say that it is a proof of admission of fault by the NGN.

Harry can’t help himself from bringing William all the time. What relevance does it have to his claim? He’s attacked Kate, the children, William incessantly. He also brought Carol into his case.

New article in the telegraph. It repeats practically the article from the other day plus Meghan’s response. https://archive.is/0QdYf

I don’t know what kind of win is such a divisive approach. One of the monarchy’s roles is to bring unity in the society. Antagonizing is not exactly a win.

I understand that the letter was answered and the answer was considered to not be “satisfactory”?