Dman
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
- Messages
- 15,827
- City
- Midwest
- Country
- United States
Half of April already and the baby still inside.?
Anytime this week could be it.
Half of April already and the baby still inside.?
Don't forget Princess Éleonore of Belgium and Prince Alexander of Sweden, King Mswati III. of Swaziland, King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden and former Pope Benedict XVI. Their birthdays are also in the next days.
I would say, April is THE royal month of the year. I am proud that April is also the month I was born.
i kinda feel bad for them i think harry's wedding is going to be chaotic with having a newborn there and having to give feedings all day...but im sure they'll do fine...but it won't give kate that much of a recovery time..but that now doesnt really seem like they put into consideration kate giving birth in choosing the wedding day..
i kinda feel bad for them i think harry's wedding is going to be chaotic with having a newborn there and having to give feedings all day...but im sure they'll do fine...but it won't give kate that much of a recovery time..but that now doesnt really seem like they put into consideration kate giving birth in choosing the wedding day..
....but that now doesnt really seem like they put into consideration kate giving birth in choosing the wedding day..
I think they did take Kate giving birth into consideration, but Harry & Meghan shouldn't have to postpone their wedding until the new baby is weaned.?
Infanta Sofia and Princess Ariane were also born in April. This month is quite popular I think. But I really hope the baby is born soon, since it's getting closer to his/her sister's birth date. I was born one day after my dad's birthday, and even though it was not on the same day, we celebrate and made a party for both of us. I never really enjoyed it though, because I always wanted to be the "star" of the day when I was a child.
I agree hel that it is much more convenient for mother and baby that they won't be too far apart that day. ?Agreed. And Windsor Castle/St. George's Chapel is *much* more convenient for a new mom than Buckingham/Westminster would be. Not that I think that's why they chose it, but it's a happy circumstance for Catherine that they did.
I think they did take Kate giving birth into consideration, but Harry & Meghan shouldn't have to postpone their wedding until the new baby is weaned.?
Agreed. And Windsor Castle/St. George's Chapel is *much* more convenient for a new mom than Buckingham/Westminster would be. Not that I think that's why they chose it, but it's a happy circumstance for Catherine that they did.
I didn’t see anyone suggest that so there is now need for that narky reply this seems to be happening a lot lately.
I think with a new born and trying to get a routine Kate will have to miss maybe parts of the reception so she can feed little baby
I believe William has an engagement on the 19th as well, all royals are attending The Queen's Dinner for CHOGM.
Only a small percentage of babies is born on their due date and the first two babies weren’t, so it makes no sense for them to keep the date clear. I actually think she’s due next week and they aren’t worried about it yet.
This article sounds like a test by PW to see who is leaking info. Tell an acquaintance something false and if it shows up in print you know who talked.
Pregnant Kate Middleton has packed onyx beads in her hospital bag | Daily Mail Online
I didn’t see anyone suggest that so there is now need for that narky reply this seems to be happening a lot lately.
I think with a new born and trying to get a routine Kate will have to miss maybe parts of the reception so she can feed little baby
This article sounds like a test by PW to see who is leaking info. Tell an acquaintance something false and if it shows up in print you know who talked.
Pregnant Kate Middleton has packed onyx beads in her hospital bag | Daily Mail Online
True. I very much doubt she will be a big presence at the receptions, and she may skip the evening party altogether -like the older royals. Zara might do the same depending on the her due date, and how comfortable she's feeling.
If Catherine does have some unexpected birthing/post-partum complications and has to miss the entire wedding, then whilst it is unfortunate I don't think it would bother the bride or groom all that much. In choosing the date they knowingly assumed all the off-chance risks involved. And frankly they were likely much more concerned in picking a date that guaranteed the presence of their parents, grandparents, and best friends. Those are their tier-one people. Catherine is merely Harry's sister-in-law, not their blood, and not their close friend. She was never going to take top priority in their wedding plans.
Whereas I fully understand that H&M are the priority here and not Catherine, if she can't attend and William is best man, who would be minding George and Charlotte as attendants?
Hahaha !
I still don't understand why people would think that your one-and-only sister-in-law who also lives next to you and is your colleague for life and has been praised as a great asset (by Meghan) and the sister you never had (by Harry) is so low on the list of priorities according to some. Are Meghan's grandparents still alive?
I do think that Harry has forged a bond with his sister-in-law over the last 15 years indeed. And yes, I am aware that there are a few houses in between but I consider all of them to be neighbors.I believe Meghan has a step-grandmother that's still alive.
The Cambridges live next to the Gloucesters. M&H live closer to the Kents. It helps to visualize KP as a complex instead of one big palace.
M&H have said complimentary things about his sister-in-law and colleague as you reference her. But that doesn't mean they have some deep bond with her. If W&C were to divorce in the near future do you honestly believe that M&H would bother to maintain a relationship with her beyond chit-chats at events involving the Cambridge children? Like I said, she isn't blood or a close friend.
Yes, and in my book William and Catherine is part of tier-1; and in yours she isn't. It's not that she recently entered the family and Harry hardly knows her... She has probably been the most important female influence in his life for many years.I'm sure they would like if she were able to attend their wedding (or parts of it), but her attendance isn't their primary concern. Just like the Cambridges weren't put out at Harry missing Charlotte's christening. Charlotte's parents, grandparents, great-grandparents and godparents attended, they were the necessary attendees.
When it comes to event planning, different people fall in different tiers of consideration.