Lady Nimue
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2014
- Messages
- 4,418
- City
- Pacific Palisades CA
- Country
- United States
Actually she could. Meghan is a much more visible woman than Mette-Marit was at the time. I think she would be selling herself short if she would opt for a Mette-Marit like gown.
That is only if you don't like the dress, which clearly you don't. Got that. But like Sartorial Splendor says, and I think applies to Meghan (with edits). Meghan should "show up in a wedding dress that [is] absolutely, uniquely her, rather than trying to use a giant fantasy dress [to be what everyone expects, perhaps even demands]."
Meghan could do worse than to have the accolade be: "this dress still holds its place as the ultimate expression of [...] personal style. [...] there has never been a better personality-to-dress match in the history of royal weddings."
Plus, something else is at issue imo: with her dress we will clearly see exactly how much Meghan is buying-into the constraints of (certain) societal expectations from certain quarters. I doubt people follow the royal wedding dress the way it is done on this thread (understandably). Mainly people see anyone's wedding dress (royal included) as an expression of them, and not the audience. Just a hunch.
No matter how much praised her gown is and will be, I don't like it. Never have. It may have been reflective of her style, but it's not mine. It's too plain/simple and too severe. For a royal bride I expect something a little more present or 'popping'.
Understood. Though to the 'popping' I think the woman's beauty is 'popping' enough, in the spirit of Coco Chanel.