FashionMaven
Courtier
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2017
- Messages
- 623
- City
- Washington D.C.
- Country
- United States
Well there you go, grandeur is a proper word
Grandeur speaks to the design, the detail, the impact it makes. 'Big' describes size. A sheath dress may be grand, but its never going to be big, just like you bling out a smart car it may be fancy, but its still going to be small.
The difference for some people is what 'grandeur means'. Many of the gowns posted like the pronovias are grand. They aren't over the top, covered in lace or bling, but they make a statement. They make a statement in design, in architecture, in details like the statement back to them. Add to that a tiara and an amazing veil, and it would be grand.
We can look at royal dresses like Charlene, Victoria, and older ones like Silvia, and know a royal wedding gown can be quite simple, rely on architectural detail, and still make a great statement.
I both agree and disagree with you, but mostly agree.
I think the Pronovias gowns are regal - I'm not sold on whether I think they are grand.
It could be the silhouette - Charlene of Monaco is the only royal bride I've seen pull off a sheath gown - but she's so tall and statuesque that she can do that - Meghan is far more petite - I am not certain a sheath style or even a modified mermaid would fit my definition of grand.
I still love that Pronovias gown with a cape. For me, that's the foundation of a gorgeous royal gown - but it's not quite there for me yet as-is, because I would want to see the back. I think the train is too short.