LadyFinn
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2007
- Messages
- 36,947
- City
- Southwest
- Country
- Finland
Nicholas Medforth-Mills posted yesterday to his Facebook that he is in Switzerland.
The report below cites "royal sources" as saying that there has been an improvement in the King's condition, that His Majesty is conscious, able to communicate and eating.
Antena 1 - Mereu cu tine a1.ro
May the blessing of this precious time be well used.
That’s how it goes sometimes just before you leave. My late grandmother was communicating and eating the day before her death. It was the oddest thing I have ever seen.
My God be with His Majesty and the rest of the royal family.
These "monarchists" have done more harm dan good. They are meddling in a family situation which has nothing to do with a monarchy. Nicholas is clearly going Trump by shooting loose farts in the media. This sort of actions will only widen the gap with his family and will only confirm their (pre)judgement that he lacks the maturity, dignity and consciousness to be a Prince of Romania.
[...] While there is no monarchy in Romania, does the royal house have assets they would be unwilling to share?
Who need enemies with "monarchist groups" like these? Apart from the situation of Nicholas, Princess Margareta is the number one and Princess Elena is the number two (assuming that these "monarchists" back the michaelian version of the succession).
Oh wait a moment.... these "monarchists" do not back the constitutional succession (the Fürst and the Erbprinz von Hohenzollern), they do not back the michaelian version of said succession (Princess Margareta and Princess Elena), they back THEIR version of the succession: 1. Nicholas, 2. Nicholas, 3. Nicholas.
It is Breitbart in optima forma.
Actually, these assertions are considered as plausibles ones, even if very hard to prove, by some respected royal experts whose advice on the matter I had the pleasure to read recently. It is even suggested that king Michael is suffering from dementia from years before he stripped his grandson from his royal title and status. The "never explain, never complain, never protest against anything made or said by a highly-esteemed royal if it can cause a scandal" is not always an attitude that serves the justice. If the appearances are to be preserved whatever the cost, even when it means there are patent injustices, then maybe "royal values" are wrong ones. Nicholas Medforth-Mills is entitled to a fair defence and to get justice if needed, may it cause a lot of stir.
But when it are the Princess Margareta-Duda machinations, then still there is no problem because they will be followed, according the michaelian version of the succession, by Princess Elena. And that is the very mama of Nicholas Medforth-Mills, and she can restore him back in grace and favour. But who is the hardest for Nicholas? Right.... la Mamma....
Who need enemies with "monarchist groups" like these? Apart from the situation of Nicholas, Princess Margareta is the number one and Princess Elena is the number two (assuming that these "monarchists" back the michaelian version of the succession).
Oh wait a moment.... these "monarchists" do not back the constitutional succession (the Fürst and the Erbprinz von Hohenzollern), they do not back the michaelian version of said succession (Princess Margareta and Princess Elena), they back THEIR version of the succession: 1. Nicholas, 2. Nicholas, 3. Nicholas.
It is Breitbart in optima forma.
there's no way that that scenario could happen. William can't be excluded from the succession, by the say so of the queen.Imagine a similar situation in Britain(I know that there are a lot of differences,but still) let's say in a few years the Queen would be in hospital,or secluded at home where nobody could visit her exept Charles and Camilla and there would be a statement that William is excluded from succession. How do you think the media and the people would react?
As much as it would be a private family matter some clarifications would be needed.
I think the Romanian public(at least those who have an interest in the monarchy) deserves a bit more transparency.
Add to this that the former King's hobby, removing and adding people to or from the Royal House or the Succession was already executed when he was in good health, with the former Queen (by account a moderating factor on the former King) was alive. Maybe the King is aware, maybe not. But there are five adult daughters responsible for their father. We hear nothing from Elizabeth Medforth-Mills or Elisabeth Biarneix. We hear nothing from the American grandchildren. The only one making a scène is Nicholas.
The only reason I can think about is Nicholas desperately wanting his frail grandfather to beg forgiveness and make him a Prince again while the rest of the royal family probably already see Nicholas as an irrelevance for the House of Romania.
These feuds are nothing new. See the Bourbon-Parmas, the Orléanses, the Due Sicilies, the Savoias, the Von Sachsens, etc.
Actually, this feud is nothing like the others, because it involves a formerly reigning house that is on the cusp of receiving an unprecedented recognition by the current republican government of their country. Further, the divisions are personal. This family is small, and was extremely united in exile, and only after the entrance on the scene of a certain individual did it all start to fracture. One would have to be extraordinarily naïve to believe otherwise - and there are plenty who are, it would appear.
Further, only one of the five adult daughters is responsible for the King. Only Crown Princess Margarita is a Swiss citizen, where Michael is kept, and clearly she (and her husband) are the ones who are making the decisions. The couple has been doing so for some time now.
Your interesting line of reasoning does nothing to dampen the immense scandal that is brewing in the mainstream Romanian press about this. There have been many stories that were told in private before all of this broke. Now, it is like a floodgate has been opened.
Suddenly the king was announced to be deathly ill. His heiress and her husband rushed to his bedside. Michael was given the last rites. His grandson, who has been denied multiple attempts to simply *see* his grandfather and has been kept totally in the dark about Michael's health, flies from London to Geneva with the hope that he will at least be able to see the man who acted as his second father before the king dies. That same day, the heads of the two houses of the Romanian parliament announced that the legislation on the royal house was finally being put forth (and it had been on the table since before Queen Anne's death). Now, radio silence about the king's health. Margarita and Radu have remained in Aubonne, but Marie is still in Bucharest. Perhaps they all knew something that Nicholas did not.
I miss your insight in the actions of Princess Margareta's Heir, who happens to be Nicholas' mother and was quite damning towards her own son. Oh wait... that must be the influence of a certain individual again, that even the own mother publicly desavoued her own son? There is a gap in your reasoninh which essentially says: all are wrong, Nicholas is good.