Countessmeout
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Messages
- 13,083
- City
- alberta
- Country
- Canada
No offense, but in the world hundreds of cable channels and online streaming, an actress like Meghan, with what is essentially a: minimum days, sag salary rate paycheck, supporting role, is very common.
does it constituted as success: meh.
Would it be enough to say get an artist visa? Yes, I’m fact I know actors who got those on far less.
So I wouldn’t say she had a “successful career” she was the same as most c-list actors who bag a minor recurring/on the cast role in an ensemble show.
I mean, she was 6th billed out of 6.. and her on screen time was at best 6 minutes of a 42 min episode.
Meghan is hardly a 'recurring' character on Suits. She was a main cast member of an ensemble show. I know that the 'recurring' fits your make her sound as tiny as humanly possible box better, but lets stick to fact.
For an actress, having a main role on a successful television show for seven years is actually considered successful. Many actors struggle to achieve that. Add to that she also did tv movies and guest things like Chopped along the way. The reality is many actors get their start on a show like Suits and it gives them a boost to bigger roles or at least more roles. We have no idea where Meghan would have gone if she had continued with acting.
She was hardly simply an actress even before she met Harry. She was already patron for World vision and the UN as well as others. She had a clothing line. She had a lifestyle blog that had a huge following.
People complaining that the only thing she has on her bio is royal duchess, like that is her only achievement. No that is what is her main role, what draws them in now. Actress, designer, charity ambassador (pre Harry). What would other royal brides in the UK have on their bio other then royal duchess?