Search results

It's not a bad idea to create a distance there - Sussexes can have Harry for all the charity work and fundraising and Meghan for the business side of things (that is, if any of her ventures will ever succeed). This way they both will be continuing to work in the fields they feel the most...

Maybe someone remembers - have we seen the sapphire engagement ring on PoW since she finished her chemo?

I think Harry was a part of the first podcast, but then it looked like the project was just Meghan's.

And (just maybe) his mother is mentioned specifically, since it's connected to Centrepoint, the same charity Diana was a patron of? Just to put it in wider context.

Princess Eugenie chose very interesting shoes at this time in her pregnancy, but both of them looked really nice today.

As much as the tiaras would be nice to see, it was a correct decision to have a coronation that could be, in a context of a coronation, be described as tame. Amazing tiaras and jewels and wealth on display on the same day as Premier League fans are organizing food banks ahead of games... not...

There was no tiaras, which means it wasn't decision of PoW, but rather dress code. Were you expecting to wear a tiara even when dress code said no tiaras? :whistling:

It's not like anyone there could ever be anything other than pleasant to Harry, especially when there are cameras around. But also I highly doubt any member of BRF wants to give him any quotes for his second or third book.

I'm sorry to the King and Queen, but Princess of Wales stole the show today. First time we see her so regal. How far she came from the shy girl around 2010s.

I doubt it's the first two. The Waleses were sitting in the car waiting for quite a long time, if they were supposed to go before the king and queen, they would.

Yes, the whole thing is carefully planned and they designed it this way.

Princess Eugenie looks absolutely radiant, even if a little bit tired. Harry looks quite awkward there.

It's nice to see the Middletons there arriving with the extended family.

WA architecture certainly makes it possible - even without elaborate decorations it looks stunning and grand in the best way possible.

Yes, the Duchess of Edinburgh was there. I didn't see any photos but she was shortly shown in the video.

Oh, I liked the dress under the coat, but the sleeves are making it even better. A great choice and great look overall today.

Can we get a count of how many "misinformations"/negative stories that drove them out of the UK Harry, without being promped to, confirmed out of his own free will? People not being able to accept constructive feedback? Slumping and crying across their desk? And he said that. In his own words...

Harry is a walking, talking joke. 'Nothing of what I've done in this book or otherwise has ever been to harm them or hurt them.'

I'm sorry for putting DM as a source, but I can't find the quotes anywhere else as of now. Article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11609675/Prince-Harry-says-rowed-Prince-William-BEARD.html We're getting here a few interesting things about the wedding. I tried (and failed) and tried...

Was this supposed to make William look bad? Because it's a heartbreaking description of someone who is trying so hard to get through to his younger brother. And if we consider this was written from Harry's perspective, it's logical to assume it will always put Harry in a better light than anyone...

I think quite similarly, yes. I doubt Catherine's name was a problem at any point - didn't Camilla gift her a bracelet with two "C" on a pendant? It might be an issue of Harry not understanding the jokes or fully knowing these were jokes but spinning it in a completely different direction. I...

That's exactly what he meant. This topic was analyzed ad nauseam during the whole Sussex royal fail - they wanted to give up the money they received from the Sovereign Grand (around 5%) and didn't mention money from (then prince) King Charles (covered 95%).

If I'm thinking about the same quote, there was no contradiction there. It was not about King Charles, then Prince Charles, not supporting them at all as a factual statement. I think he just wanted to emphasize that Charles was not giving them money out of the goodness of his heart, but that...

But does one need the "inaccurate reporting" to form an opinion? I think Harry and Meghan are giving people enough reason to dislike them without ever reading anything about them. Because sure, there are tabloid stories that are clearly negative (though, sometimes, it doesn't equal untrue), but...

By no means it's doing badly, but no, it's not even close to the most watched Netflix production. Right now at the top are Squid Game, Stranger Things and Wednesday with over 1 billion hours watched (each), while Harry & Meghan have over 81 millions hours watched. It's quite a lot of distance...