Hallo girl
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2007
- Messages
- 2,567
- City
- Scotland
- Country
- United Kingdom
I thought it looked ok. At least the trousers finished at the ankle not the floor.
I'd trip up if I wore trousers that long!
My comment on this outfit is not dissimilar to a view I have expressed previously. IMO, this is a " classic" Meghan outfit: ill-fitting, crumpled, lacking design integrity and expensive!
I agree, just okay.I thought it looked ok. At least the trousers finished at the ankle not the floor.
Very true. Maybe up close you could see quality but it just looked like an off the peg blouse and slacks combo.I agree, just okay.
Really, for the cost, I would expect something exquisite, not something to dismiss as ok.
£2k for a blouse and a pair of trousers that just looked ok. It didn’t look anything special to warrant that money.I thought the interview outfit was good and not outrageously expensive at under £2k. She was appropriately dressed for television and also respectful of the families she met.
How much was Jane Pauley’s outfit, for comparison?
I don't care for that peplum effect.They both look good.
Suave and sophisticated, both of them.I think Meghan looked lovely. Navy isn’t a colour I really care for but this outfit was well fitted, especially the slim-line pants. Very smart indeed.
I am not convinced the second dress was particularly well suited for the engagement.The second outfit, the dress with the reddish and white print seemed to be the same design as her gold strapless NY dress and a print dress worn in Nigeria. There must be a comfort and confidence level for her in the design. The slit in the front of the dress is a bit daring for someone who is going to sit on stages, but Meghan seems to be navigating that successfully.
Probably, the top and pants are different designers.It may be a trick of the light, but the top looks to be a different shade than the rest.