Zonk
Administrator
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2005
- Messages
- 13,173
- City
- Somewhere in
- Country
- United States
I totally concur that Henry was the problem. Again, if Anne had done anything to Catherine and Mary that he didn't approve of he would have put a stop to it and yet he didn't. But this thread isn't about Henry its about his wives.
I totally get the issue of the the rival court, and I agree that people were hedging their bets and yes, the same was done to Anne with Jane Seymour, with Anne of Cleves with Catherine Howard. Only Catherine Howard's early execution stopped the same from happening to her. And well, some could argue that Henry's death saved Catherine Parr from the same fate as some of her predecessors.
And yes, the Tudor Court was dog eat dog world...but really some of things that Anne has been accused of and how she treated Catherine and her daughter were totally unnecessary. You already have the woman's husband, he wants to marry you what else is there to do to Catherine...its a little over kill IMO.
If Anne certainly didn't attend to poison Mary, perhaps she should have kept quiet about such rumours. And therefore people wouldn't have assumed that she did it. How sad is it to wish for the death of your lover/husbands child. If he can turn on her, he can certainly turn on you...and that is exactly what he did.
Like I said in an earlier post, I concur with most scholars that Anne was framed and executed because Henry wanted a clean break. Catherine was already dead, and if Anne was dead, there would no longer be the grey issues of who was married and wasn't and therefore who was legitimate. As we know, these issues of illegitimacy followed both daughters Mary and Elizabeth as they were not considered true legitimate Queens by both Catholic and Protestant factions.
So I stand by my assertion that you reap what you sow. Yes, Anne was most likely not guilty of what she was executed on but she was certainly guilty of what she did to Catherine and Mary. That is certainly not something to be executed over...but hey...you play nasty with the big dogs you have to expect to get bitten.
I totally get the issue of the the rival court, and I agree that people were hedging their bets and yes, the same was done to Anne with Jane Seymour, with Anne of Cleves with Catherine Howard. Only Catherine Howard's early execution stopped the same from happening to her. And well, some could argue that Henry's death saved Catherine Parr from the same fate as some of her predecessors.
And yes, the Tudor Court was dog eat dog world...but really some of things that Anne has been accused of and how she treated Catherine and her daughter were totally unnecessary. You already have the woman's husband, he wants to marry you what else is there to do to Catherine...its a little over kill IMO.
If Anne certainly didn't attend to poison Mary, perhaps she should have kept quiet about such rumours. And therefore people wouldn't have assumed that she did it. How sad is it to wish for the death of your lover/husbands child. If he can turn on her, he can certainly turn on you...and that is exactly what he did.
Like I said in an earlier post, I concur with most scholars that Anne was framed and executed because Henry wanted a clean break. Catherine was already dead, and if Anne was dead, there would no longer be the grey issues of who was married and wasn't and therefore who was legitimate. As we know, these issues of illegitimacy followed both daughters Mary and Elizabeth as they were not considered true legitimate Queens by both Catholic and Protestant factions.
So I stand by my assertion that you reap what you sow. Yes, Anne was most likely not guilty of what she was executed on but she was certainly guilty of what she did to Catherine and Mary. That is certainly not something to be executed over...but hey...you play nasty with the big dogs you have to expect to get bitten.