Artemisia
Heir Presumptive, Royal Blogger
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 5,436
- City
- Yerevan
- Country
- Armenia
That may be true for "ordinary" women (commoners) but a lot of royal and noble women enjoyed great deal of power and influence.I honestly can't fault any of Henry's wives. They were women living in a society where they had absolutely no power- each one of them, in her own way, did what she had to do.
It's enough to look at some of the women of the time - Marguerite of Navarre (sister of Francis I of France), Margaret of Austria (daughter of Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor), Catherine de' Medici (consort of Henry II), Jeanne d'Albret (Queen of Navarre), Diane de Poitiers (Henry II's favourite), and so many others.
In fact, Henry's first two Queens - Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn - were very influential. Catherine was Regent of the Kingdom in Henry's absence and even personally led armies (more successfully than her husband, I must add) when there was a threat of foreign invasion. Anne's influence is well-documented and she has rightly been called the most influential Queen Consort in English/British history.
Even ordinary women in England had far more rights than in continental Europe or other places, including rights of property and inheritance.