My guess would be because 1) it wasn't a state affair and 2) the dress code was uniform, lounge suit or morning dress for the gents and dresses and hats for the ladies. NO one other than the members of the RF that were in uniform wore any kind of orders. With him wearing his OBE, it probably came across like wearing a tiara with sweats and sneakers. Just my thoughts on it.
At the end of the day let me stress that I don't think any harm was done by DB even if he technically was at fault for wearing his OBE. For a start, it did not block anybody's view! [think of all those LARGE hats!!!]
Alex
I am still inclined to believe that some of those hats were satellite dishes in disguise for the wedding broadcast.
I can't believe it either. India Hicks was not invited, nor does it seem anyone from the Duke of Fife line, or worse, the Earl of Harewood line. Its like Princess Mary's entire line has been erased from any event. Sad, so sad. Also, I am sorry, IMO, David wore his decoration because he and Posh truly think they are royalty. I did not care for the smug, nose in the air look, he had on when sat down. Thankfully, she finally looked like was put in her place, when she realized..."Oh, this is what REAL royalty looks like."
Why don't you think he was correct in wearing it at all?
I wouldn't be surprised if India Hicks was not invited because she gave a lot of interviews about her memories of serving as a bridesmaid at Charles and Diana's wedding. Also, it doesn't really look like she was very close to William.
All I can offer by way of a response is that we have been continually told that the guestlist is the work of Catherine and William who have been very heavily involved in its compilation [compare Charles and Diana's Wedding and that of Sarah and Andrew, where both couples' main input was to supply lists of their own friends and relatives who they wanted to attend]. With William and Catherine's wedding, we have been told that every single decision about the ceremony, the receptions, the guestlist etc has been the 'hands-on' work of Catherine and William and they believe that the mix of guests they have chosen is one which is the best way of arriving at the most 'personal' wedding they can.
Incidentally, I understand that an invitation to President Obama and in particular his wife Michelle was NOT issued because of the HUGE extra security that would be required, which is apparently necessary in addition to the present large security operation. Apparently lots of US secret service people would have had to be present and it would have been impossible [allegedly] to integrate them with the present English arrangements. To 'compensate' for any alleged 'snub' to the Obamas, a State Visit is being planned for them in a few weeks' time.
Hope this helps
Alex
The Obama visit has been set for quite some time. They weren't invited as he is Head of State. It was not a snub, as the Obama's and the BRF are not friends, as the late President and Nancy Reagan and former President Bush (41) and Barbara are.
Prince Charles is at the White House as I write - just a courtesy call. They'll probably talk about windmills or something like that. LOLOL
It was in the entertainment news here in the US that Snoop Dogg was invited, however, he had to turn down the invitation. He didn't mention what the reason was for doing that. Just how many times did William and Catherine meet Snoop that he deserved that invitation? I think he performed like one song in that Princess Diana memorial concert, that was it.
Why are we still talking about the Obamas and this wedding?
I suppose because some people are still in the dark about how things work and why they work like they work.
It could also be a matter of feeling of importance aka "he should have been invited because he is...".
Anyway, it won't change a thing - the wedding didn't have this setup. Case closed.
Yes, KittyAltanta, you are quite right, the Obama State Visit HAS been set for some time; the point I was trying to make though was based on the press reports [including The Times and The Telgraph, not just the tabloid trash' that Michelle Obama had made it known that she wanted to attend the Wedding [not with the President, just by herself]. It is a matter of record that Mrs Obama has enjoyed quite warm relations with the Queen during their meetings.
The Times and the Telgraph both carried articles [which were not challenged as untrue] emphasing that no snub was being intended to Michelle Obama by not inviting her: the reason, as you correctly gave, pointed to the fact that the Wedding was not a state affair but a family affair, but also pointed out that whilst it would have be very easy [not withstanding the 'family' nature of the affair] to invite but Mrs Obama as she wanted to come, this idea has to be abandoned because of the massive security headaches this would cause. I am aware personally of a number of Americans in London who felt this was a 'snub' to the United States, and I am sure that this is why the papers of record continuing repeated the Palace position that the forthcoming State visit was ample 'compensation'.
... Femme Obama ...
ladongas said:I am not familiar with the name Femme Obama.
I believe it means Mrs Obama or wife of Obama or somthing like that in French
Thanks. I just couldn't imagine why anyone would call Mrs. Obama or Michelle Obama or First Lady Michelle Obama something like Femme. Is that a usual way to refer to French women, e.g. Femme Sarkozy? I was concerned that it was intended as a slight to our president's wife, inasmuch as I had never encountered this usage before.