wanderer said:
Why do people say if CP Victoria and Daniel are not marry next year, then they will never marry? Why the marriage has to be held next year but not in 2009 or in 2010? What is so special about the year of 2008? She can marry at age 36 and still have children at age 40. Many women in recent years choose to marry in their mid 30s or early 40s. I don't understand why people have so much fuss about her marriage. Thanks for answering my questions!
Yes, exactly...they can also marry in 2013...she can bring him to even more public duties, and he can give more interviews, and they can kiss everytime they spot a camera...who cares about protocol and traditions. Ppl eat everything anyway...so why should you be so stupid to marry and to live a life together, when it´s so much more fun to sneak to your boyfriend´s apartment after being done with your work. So much more exciting than sharing a bed for 365 days a year. And as long as the tax payers stick a few million SEK up to your **** every year, things don´t matter.
So the thing, why some ppl believe, that they would never marry, if not in 2008, is, that they are still believing, that Victoria is following traditions...and that the alleged signals, they have sent, had to mean something.
But as things are at the moment Victoria has noted a long time ago, that ppl forgive&accept everything...she has the naked toddler bonus from the 70ties, and as long as she is laughing, when knocking over a pole, everything is fine. And if though a republican wind would blow in lille Sverigeland, she could always tell about herself being so nervous, doing her very best for the country and even about never giving up the throne for love. Yes, she has learned a great deal of cousin Frederik*
Sorry, it´s St. Cynism day here...give me some sugar
*In all fairness one though has to say, that her working ethics are better.