yes, but why should he? Harry is a grown man. he and his wife wnated to leave the RF TO MAKE MORE MONEY. If they do that, then they cannot expect Charles to fund them indefinitley. Harry's apparent belief that someone should pay his bills forever makes him look ridiculous....
Think of it this way. If Beatrice or Eugenie said in an interview that they expected their father or grandmother to fund their security indefinitely whilst also paying for their celebrity lifestyle in the US there would be outrage. Especially if they also bitched about the taxpayer not paying for their protection since they were 18 in the first place. Especially if they also attached everything about the family in the process. Or cry sexism because they didn't get titles on their wedding days.
The thought process that they could leave and do and say whatever they want, including talking politics and bashing the family and Charles should pick up the tab for them indefinitely is absurd. So he pays for the "necessities" in a highly expensive place in California where their neighbours are billionaires whilst they're free to spend the rest on living that lavish lifestyle? That's not how life works.
And UK/Canadian/US taxpayers most certainly don't want to pick up that bill.
Even parents who help out with a house or grandkids schooling aren't *expected* to do it. And those parents are usually working at least one job each.
Harry and Meghan: We want to leave because it's toxic and we hate it! We want to be free to live our truth! Also we want you to pay for everything and keep those toxic, hierarchical titles. And have one for our son. That guarantees more public interest in him and more public complaining about the way he's living his life.
In what way does that make sense?
Last edited: