As someone who was around for the Diana-Fergie years of unrelenting media and press intrusion, I think they, especially Fergie, received unbelievable attention and in Fergie's case, soul shattering criticism, ala The Duchess of Pork.
Princess Margaret got bad press too, laughed at and mocked over her younger lover "toy boy, Roddy".
Unfortunately, Sarah thru her foolish actions, played into their hands, something The Sussex's are guilty of too. Like being tone deaf on the South African Tour and complaining that no one asks how Meghan is "feeling" while visiting in an area of abject poverty no less. That's when the "coverage" turned and whispers of Megan's high handedness and demanding bossy demeanor issues with Staff started to be heard.
I also think that Meghan tries to hard to make sure WHATEVER narrative or Story she wants to project always seems to depict her as being "better" than others. Like how She left Deal or No Deal, basically because it in her eyes "objectified" Women, and got big blow back from many. From Whoopie Goldberg to her former co-workers, who resented that insinuation.
Or being a "game-changer". That is a very important part of her personality. From the never ending retelling of the dishwasher soapsuds commercial to the cringe inducing moment in the docu-series where upon visiting her old School Principal She reminded her that She was always going to be famous ..... Really ?
Or her "victim" status, that She bring up too frequently also. Poor Me. A constant refrain.
For example, In the Podcast She mentioned the supposed "fire-smoking heater" situation that sounded exaggerated, contrived and drama Queenish. How "they" made her go to the next Engagement in South Africa, when Archie was NEVER in any danger.
But I thought the worst, absolute worst, was in the Docu-series interview letting the World AND her poor niece think that the Palace had banned Ashleigh from coming to The Wedding. The Palace "insiders" have pushed back on that, saying that simply isn't true. Had Meghan wanted her there, she would have been there.
But Meghan didn't want awkward conversations or whispers about nutty sister Samantha, so it was easier to not to have Ashleigh there. I found that part in the docu-series where Ashleigh talks about her hurt at being excluded shameful. So sad.
I feel Meghan used her in the docu-series to promote the "mean-bad Palace" narrative and willingly didn't invite her to the Wedding, on a pretext of lies.
Princess Margaret got bad press too, laughed at and mocked over her younger lover "toy boy, Roddy".
Unfortunately, Sarah thru her foolish actions, played into their hands, something The Sussex's are guilty of too. Like being tone deaf on the South African Tour and complaining that no one asks how Meghan is "feeling" while visiting in an area of abject poverty no less. That's when the "coverage" turned and whispers of Megan's high handedness and demanding bossy demeanor issues with Staff started to be heard.
I also think that Meghan tries to hard to make sure WHATEVER narrative or Story she wants to project always seems to depict her as being "better" than others. Like how She left Deal or No Deal, basically because it in her eyes "objectified" Women, and got big blow back from many. From Whoopie Goldberg to her former co-workers, who resented that insinuation.
Or being a "game-changer". That is a very important part of her personality. From the never ending retelling of the dishwasher soapsuds commercial to the cringe inducing moment in the docu-series where upon visiting her old School Principal She reminded her that She was always going to be famous ..... Really ?
Or her "victim" status, that She bring up too frequently also. Poor Me. A constant refrain.
For example, In the Podcast She mentioned the supposed "fire-smoking heater" situation that sounded exaggerated, contrived and drama Queenish. How "they" made her go to the next Engagement in South Africa, when Archie was NEVER in any danger.
But I thought the worst, absolute worst, was in the Docu-series interview letting the World AND her poor niece think that the Palace had banned Ashleigh from coming to The Wedding. The Palace "insiders" have pushed back on that, saying that simply isn't true. Had Meghan wanted her there, she would have been there.
But Meghan didn't want awkward conversations or whispers about nutty sister Samantha, so it was easier to not to have Ashleigh there. I found that part in the docu-series where Ashleigh talks about her hurt at being excluded shameful. So sad.
I feel Meghan used her in the docu-series to promote the "mean-bad Palace" narrative and willingly didn't invite her to the Wedding, on a pretext of lies.
Last edited: