Harry may have a sincere desire to help but at the end of the day, whatever he does and says, is to earn money/build their brand.
That's why he has PR people who assist and spread the message.
And that's why there will always be criticism. Harry lectures other people for personal gain, Charles may lecture people too but not for personal gain.
And Harry has been caught countless times preaching water and drinking wine.
It will all continue because with leaving the RF, Harry became just an ordinary celebrity who has to stay relevant by gracing the public with his virtues, in Harry's case speeches that hopefully interest somebody and public charity.
There were people much more talented and clever who tried to reinvent the wheel regarding press coverage, so good luck with that.
This is what I don't understand. I'm not saying you can't be a businessman and a philanthropist but Harry for some reason, gave up a role which was about service to others, like his father, where he had a private fortune and access to a comfortable wealthy lifestyle.. And why? Apparently to make more money? So why is he now telling us that he and we should be doing good, serving the world.. but what he is presumably doing in California isn't serving.. he could do that at home.. but making money. So its a bit weird to be lectured by someone like him. It seems to me that he's blurred the lines a lot between service and charity and making money.