MarleneKoenig
Nobility
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2009
- Messages
- 450
- City
- Alexandria, VA
- Country
- United States
I should add that Timo's widow has adopted several adults.
Theophana and her husband were divorced. Moreover, Timo, who had little contact with his children while they were growing up,as they were raised by their maternal family, was in need of money. Hermann Montanus paid Timo for a surname, just as Robert Lichtenberg did when he was adopted by Marie Auguste of Anhalt
Well, that certainly ist true, but you should look at his life in and after the war, most of which is known only to his family.Might be true? It is true. Timo was what we call the black sheep of the family....
I do not suppose he uses the title of Markgraf of Meissen.
As i understand it their statement is that Alexander was adopted and is therefore not a member of the nobility, that he is not a member of the house of Wettin and that he is not the successor of Markgraf Maria Emanuel von Meissen
But i'm not completely clear on whether there's a reason for this statement now...?
As a reason for the statement the phrase "the public is entitled to know the truth" is used, but that seems a bit cryptic to me?
Also the german Nobility association dioes not recognize Alexander as member of the Royal House of Saxony and also not as it's Head.What a mess. To the best of my understanding, the document basically states that the Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach, the Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and the Duke of Saxe-Meiningen, as Heads of the three surviving lines of the House of Wettin, do not recognize Mr. Alexander Prinz von Sachsen as a member of the House of Wettin, nor as a Prince of Saxony and neither as the Head of the Royal House of Saxony.
What I wonder is, do they have any right to question the succession of the Housee of Saxony? And who should be the successor to the late Margrave of Meissen?
Saxony became an independent country from 1806 and it legally had its own succession rules not connected to the pre-1806 condition, which still affects the families once ruling in the Wettiner Thuringian duchies.
The Saxon Constitution of 1831 in its 7th article permitted the Crown of Saxony to go to a female (of the closest line to her predecessor) or to her heir in the event of the extinction of all equal agnatic members of the Royal House, with the premise the equality of marriages was preserved …
Once the late Margrave of Meissen considered his sisters' marriage to be an equal one, then her offspring should be considered entitled for succession...
Also, The Königlich Sächsisches Hausgesetz (Saxon Royal House Law) of 1837, in its first article stated clearly that the Royal House of Saxony consisted in the Albertiner Line of the House of Saxony, explicitly saying it is/was composed both by princes and princesses of the family born of equal marriages.
Article 3 says the Princesses are ranked according to their succession rights to the throne.
Article 15 speaks of their right of succession in the terms of Article 7 of the Constitution of Saxony of 1831.
The Royal House of Saxony is independent. Still they are right when they say HRH The Margrave of Meissen is not a real Wettin, that's not questionable, I myself tend to see this line as the Wettin-Afif.