Blog Real
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2013
- Messages
- 14,131
- City
- Lisboa
- Country
- Portugal
The monarchy is restored in Romania.
Based on the article provided by Benjamin, Romania is going to have a referendum in 2016. When did the restoration happen?The monarchy is restored in Romania.
Based on the article provided by Benjamin, Romania is going to have a referendum in 2016. When did the restoration happen?
I wonder if a restoration in Romania would have any effects to Bulgaria, Albania, Serbia, Montenegro, Portugal etc.
You wrote, "The monarchy is restored in Romania. ". One might assume that you used the wrong form of the verb "to be".The monarchy will only be restored if they make a referendum and if the monarchy win.
You wrote, "The monarchy is restored in Romania. ". One might assume that you used the wrong form of the verb "to be".
I think that was the case. Not all members on the forums are native English speakers, so there will of course be some language barriers. At first, I had read it as "the monarchy has now been restored in Romania", which did get me a little excited! I even did a bit of research to see if it were true or not.
I hope the referendum has positive results, it would be great if the monarchy could be restored in Romania. The Romanian Royal Family already seem to be quite active and care about their country a lot. This makes me think that Serbia could also restore their monarchy one day - Crown Prince Alexander and Crown Princess Katherine seem to do a lot for the country and I have a feeling they would be brilliant monarchs.
If the Romanian monarchy is restored, it will be interesting to see whether or not King Michael will continue to reign, or if Crown Princess Margareta or indeed Prince Nicolae will become the next monarch. Do we know if the rule where older women can rule before younger men has been adopted yet in Romania?
I don't think we should get our hopes up too high just yet. There's a very serious hurdle to jump first: the current Constitution of Romania, Article 152(1) states that the republican form of government "shall not be subject to revision." So there would have to be a referendum to repeal Article 152(1) before a referendum on the monarchy could take place. You could run them concurrently, but it would be a bit awkward if Article 152(1) failed and the monarchy passed. There's also the dream of unification with Moldova by 2018, the centenary of the Kingdom of Greater Romania. Who knows what sort of issues and complications this could cause. Though, maybe, unification with Moldova would be a good excuse to start fresh with a brand new constitution (or even the old one from 1923).
Isn't the referendum going to be designed to stamp out monarchism?
The PM who proposed the referendum is a left-winger, and thus presumably opposed to the monarchy. Wouldn't he guide the referendum so that the monarchists are sure to lose, and, in his view, settle the issue once and for all? If he has control over the questions and timing, he could give the republicans a large advantage.
It's to be expected that in a "honeymoon period" for the new incumbent, the institution of the presidency is seen in a more positive light, particularly given the divisive influence of the previous president.
I wonder what level of support there would be for a "third way" combining a ceremonial Monarchy and an elected president of the executive.
What you call the "third way" is actually the standard in most European monarchies today, either de facto or de jure. I doubt any Romanian monarchist would seriously propose anything different from that.
The position of the Royal Family regarding the issue of the Restoration convinced many royalists it's useless to ask for Monarchy.
The position of the Royal Family regarding the issue of the Restoration convinced many royalists it's useless to ask for Monarchy.