Thank you!tiaraprin said:Great Post of the family tree Mapple!!! Kudos to you!!
emily62_1 said:it's weird as only Alicky, P. Alice's daughter was a carrier btw Alice's kids, is it true, in fact Aliexei, the Tzarevitc, was not healthy- were the Leopold kids sane or ill, can't remember ????? Hemoephilia is a weird illness. Prince Philip, the Prince Consort, who descends from P. Alice is not ill, in fact. the illness did not pass from P. Anne to her son, Philip, well, _I know he's healthy, luckily, the illness seems to have disappered from the RF members nowadays. Sorry, I'm confused.
emily62_1 said:it's weird as only Alicky, P. Alice's daughter was a carrier
Irene certainly was a carrier--two of her sons were haemophiliacs.Elspeth said:We don't know if her sister Elizabeth was a carrier because she didn't have children. It seems as though Victoria wasn't a carrier; I don't know about Irene.
Elspeth said:We don't know if her sister Elizabeth was a carrier because she didn't have children. It seems as though Victoria wasn't a carrier; I don't know about Irene.
emily62_1 said:sure, 1830, I get easily confused when it comes to the British Rf in the 1800s.
tiaraprin said:Victoria was the mother of Lord Mountbatten, Princess Alice of Greece, and Queen Louise of Sweden. Thus, she is the grandmother of the Duke of Edinburgh. With the Duke marrying the Queen, we have not heard anything. Queen Louise never had any children, and Lord Mountbatten married outside the royal circles to Edwina Ashley.
"...some other problem" ? I think it could be said that George, 2nd Marquess of Milford Haven, died at the age of 45 as a result of being "partied out". A touch of over-indulgence, perhaps?chrissy57 said:There was another son beside Lord Mountbatten and that was the Second Marquis of Milford Haven. He and his son both died relatively early compared to the other members of the family. I am not suggesting that either had the disease but they may have some other problem.
Warren said:"...some other problem" ? I think it could be said that George, 2nd Marquess of Milford Haven, died at the age of 45 as a result of being "partied out". A touch of over-indulgence, perhaps?
W
chrissy57 said:I was simply pointing out that there were two sons of the Victoria not one as the earlier poster had mentioned and that this son and his son died relatively young. With both of them dying relatively young there would be 'some other problem' - i.e. partying too much is a problem isn't it? Self-inflicted sure - but a problem nevertheless.
A haemophiliac courtier in the early 19th Century? In my humble opinion not very likely. Any proof?emily62_1 said:why think of a gene mutation, which is so rare indeed, when the answer is there, under our eyes?
lashinka2002 said:I don't know if you can say the illness has disappeared, the truth may simply be that its treatable now. The RF wouldn't disclose all of thier illness' to the public unless they absolutely had to. I think every royal house who has a genetic link to this disease just may keep it private. If it has just disappeared I'm guessing it could possibly have been weaned out by Royal members not marrying cousins so close in thier genetic pool. I could be wrong too.
emily62_1 said:well, with our modern media ,how could have they possibly managed to hide from media the news that any Royal member has inherited the illness ? I'm really startled, in less than 100 years, who was the lasyt RF member who suffered from this illness, Alexei ? well, it has just desappeared, gone away......
Mapple said:A haemophiliac courtier in the early 19th Century? In my humble opinion not very likely. Any proof?
wymanda said:The following link explains it all and also provides the information on Queen Victoria's mothers family and the strong chance that the gene came from there.
http://www.geocities.com/jesusib/haemophilia.html
Yes, either that or a new mutation. It would have been very difficult for Viktoria of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld to find a haemophiliac lover in the early 19th Century.wymanda said:IMO the most likely source for the Haemophilia being introduced was QV's mother Victiore of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. As I have linked before there was a high infant mortality rate in her family in the generations prior to her marriage to the Duke of Kent.
I don't want to hijack the thread, but the case of Paul I is far from being clear-cut. Catherine herself named one of the Saltykovs as Paul's father (privately and not for 'public consumption', of course) and she had many affairs, but Paul I bore a striking resemblance to Peter III.josie21 said:... many women in the royals familly had take another men to have an heir because their husband couldnt have one. catherine the great did that..
The real father ought to have been a haemophiliac then, barring the case of a 'sleeping' gene.josie21 said:maybe her real father had the gene and pass to her because there seems to have any hemophiliac before her in both of the familly...
josie21 said:the gene are not in the brtitish royal today.. but he must be in spain..
it is possible that queen victoria was a love child. there were emergency in the royal familly to have an heir because there where not child who could succeed the throne at that time. her mother and father was really old at that time to have a child and many women in the royals familly had take another men to have an heir because their husband couldnt have one. catherine the great did that.. maybe her real father had the gene and pass to her because there seems to have any hemophiliac before her in both of the familly...
Mapple said:Yes, either that or a new mutation. It would have been very difficult for Viktoria of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld to find a haemophiliac lover in the early 19th Century.
auntie said:I read on a website an article about a book someone wrote about the Russian Royal family, and he claims, with proof that Alexei didn't have Hemophelia, and that it was misdiagnosed and that Rasputin underdtood it and used it to his advantage! interesting, hmm,
tiaraprin said:Can you tell us the website??