Every time the subject of Mabel's past comes up, I have to wonder if there is more than we know about why Beatrix permitted that marriage to go forward, with or without Friso losing his place in the succession. Something just always seemed off about the whole thing.
But who knows? (We never will.) For their daughters' sake, I hope they're all happy now.
You can't really forbid an adult from getting married (at least where Friso and Mabel lived) all you can do is show that there will be official consequences if the match is disapproved of, in this case Friso losing his place in the royal house and succession.
As for him not being enthusiastic, apart from maybe not likely publicity as Margeno said many people appear more solemn and serious on their wedding because it's a big commitment.
If he didn't want to marry her he could have broken up with her and left them both free to find other people.
Also rather bizarre: 'the world' got to know about her at the funeral of prince Claus when she joined the family in the catacomb for the 'interment'. The others were queen Beatrix, his sons and their wives and his 5 living sisters.
Ok, in that case I just don't understand who 'they' are in your sentence "For their daughters' sake, I hope they're all happy now."Of course I know the story of what happened to Friso. That really doesn't have anything to do with Mabel's past or why Beatrix would have permitted the marriage.
Beatrix knew that forbidding was useless, the outcome would have been the same... And it seems that Beatrix was willing to give her blessing as she was really happy about/impressed by Mabel but unlike most other countries, in the Netherlands, it is not up to the monarch (parent) but to the government and parliament.I don't think Beatrix's sister's experience would have come into play, either -- the outcome for Friso and Irene was the same in that they were married and lost their places in the succession.
??? Are you truly saying that Friso would just as happily have said good-bye to Mabel after they had been together for several years and he wanted to marry her?! Do you have other evidence than his facial expressions that were completely consistent with how the Netherlands got to know him: i.e., never 'enthusiastic' and rather serious - at least in the public eye.Many people noted at the time of the wedding that Friso didn't seem that enthusiastic about the marriage, so I doubt "forbidding" it would have been a problem for him.
Also rather bizarre: 'the world' got to know about her at the funeral of prince Claus when she joined the family in the catacomb for the 'interment'. The others were queen Beatrix, his sons and their wives and his 5 living sisters.
That is bizarre indeed, though not as bizarre as her apparent stalking of the now Prime Minister. Since it involves the PM and was supposedly witnessed by other prominent politicians and people, wouldn't somebody have denied it by now if it wasn't true at all?
I did know about the mafia boss and the married Bosnian politician, though not in any detail. That article was very interesting, thank you!
There is definitely a question as to why she would be involved with such a dangerous criminal. And without knowing for sure what happened, there rather seems to have been a pattern of behavior of getting close to powerful men - even shady ones. With the aim of advancing herself?
What baffles me is that, as a clearly very intelligent person, she thought she could get away with telling lies, when she knew her life would be looked at by an intelligence agency. Or perhaps she merely hoped to delay the discoveries?
I don’t think she did. Friso walked down with Beatrix, WA with M etc, she might have been at the service but wasn’t sat on the front row.
I don’t think she did. Friso walked down with Beatrix, WA with M etc, she might have been at the service but wasn’t sat on the front row.
That is bizarre indeed, though not as bizarre as her apparent stalking of the now Prime Minister. Since it involves the PM and was supposedly witnessed by other prominent politicians and people, wouldn't somebody have denied it by now if it wasn't true at all?
I did know about the mafia boss and the married Bosnian politician, though not in any detail. That article was very interesting, thank you!
There is definitely a question as to why she would be involved with such a dangerous criminal. And without knowing for sure what happened, there rather seems to have been a pattern of behavior of getting close to powerful men - even shady ones. With the aim of advancing herself?
What baffles me is that, as a clearly very intelligent person, she thought she could get away with telling lies, when she knew her life would be looked at by an intelligence agency. Or perhaps she merely hoped to delay the discoveries?
I assume that she first met Sacirbey in a work-capacity; and it indeed seems she didn't shy away from but rather moved closer to the powerful - even when shady. Mabel herself stated once that all her relationships with powerful men are interpreted differently because she is a woman and people have a hard time understanding that women can be successful as well.
I am not quite sure if Sacirbey was considered 'shady' at that time. From what I remembered it was the opposite. He was presented as some sort of hero in the Western press. The shady business dealings were revealed much later, around the year 2001. At the time of the Dayton agreements Mabel was only 26 y/o, just starting out in her carreer. It is not overly surprising that she would be impressed by him.
I can't really remember but was there much public disapproval of the Johan Friso -Mabel engagement?
Mabel did tell Friso about it, so it was a conscious decision of the couple not to disclose that information - neither to the PM nor to the queen if I'm not mistaken.When Prince Friso met Mabel, a decade later, she was so far in her stellar career that the encounters with Mr Bruinsma in her student years were just a detail. But for a marriage with a Prince of the Netherlands a less desirable detail. She chose not to tell she knew Mr Bruinsma. And that was what haunted her. The Prime Minister thought: if you did not tell me this "detail", maybe there are more "details"?
And in a reflex (by hindsight way too hasty) he considered the Government would not offer a Bill of Consent to Parliament. Prince Friso then let the Prime Minister know he would not seek permission for his intended marriage, so the Government would not need to offer a Bill anyway.
Klaas Bruinsma: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-cqatS39G...iOhi1Joz4UJQzYXACLcB/s1600/Klaas+Bruinsma.png
Mabel did tell Friso about it, so it was a conscious decision of the couple not to disclose that information - neither to the PM nor to the queen if I'm not mistaken.
And Friso's move to let the PM know he didn't seek permission would of course not have happened had there been no controversy - including a PM considering not to offer a Bill of Consent. He was just getting 'ahead of the game'; it's like people suddenly asking to be relieved of their jobs when they are well aware that a dismissal is imminent.
The fact is she did; as can also be seen in this video. As she didn't have an official status of course she wasn't seated at the front row (she was seated in the third row) BUT she walked down with the family - she walked next to the youngest of prince Claus's sisters at the end of the small cortege (easily recognizable from the back because of her blond hair).
Apologies, I was indeed wrong! And yes, a strange way to introduce someone to the public.
Apologies, I was indeed wrong! And yes, a strange way to introduce someone to the public.
The painful thing was the clumsy handling by the then Prime Minister. While the other Prime Ministers (Irene, Christina) simply took note of the no request, Mr Balkenende blabbed he would not support a request by Prince Friso. With this the "elegant escape" was tarnished.