Duc_et_Pair
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2014
- Messages
- 13,234
- City
- City
- Country
- Netherlands
The correct title is HRH Princess of Wales
HRH The Princess of Wales.
The correct title is HRH Princess of Wales
I think that Diana started out as Lady Di and when she married the Press moved on to Princess Di. Kate and Meghan were both known to the press for ssome time before their marriage, as single girls and known by their maiden names.
The correct title is HRH Princess of Wales
I keep seeing Catherine referenced as Catherine, Princess of Wales. This is incorrect, no? She is Her Royal Highness The Princess of Wales?
No, Her Royal Highness (HRH) The Princess of Wales.
According to a family member it was more common to hear people in real life refer to "Lady Di" after her marriage than newspapers and magazines who moved on to Princess Di.
Kate was obviously around as Kate Middleton for 10 years so people got used to referring to her as that. And that leads to people search for "Kate Middleton gold dress" for example rather than "Duchess of Cambridge Gold dress". Thus more online media use her maiden name for SEO etc. This wasn't an issue when Diana married in.
I think we'll see a lot of "Princess Catherine/Kate" from here on out and some "Catherine/Kate, Princess of Wales" because even though it's for a divorced woman it is recognisable since Diana and Fergie both use/d it as does Meghan somewhat "officially".
I don't know why Anglosaxon media are so keen on Will and Kate. Imagine Belgian media calling their royal couple Phil and Til or Dutch media calling theirs Lex and Max.
And the use of last names as Parker-Bowles or Middleton. No media uses Tjessem Hoiby or De Lannoy to the Norwegian resp. Luxembourgian counterparts.
Very peculiar habits in Anglosaxon media!
According to a family member it was more common to hear people in real life refer to "Lady Di" after her marriage than newspapers and magazines who moved on to Princess Di.
Not in my experience. I collected all newspapers and magazines that featured Diana during the entire era from engagement to death. As soon as she was married, at least in the UK and USA she instantly became known as Princess Diana or Princess Di. "Lady Di" was only really continued in non English speaking press like France and Italy. As far as what people in their own homes called her, I don't know. But at least in all English speaking media, the overwhelming majority was Princess Diana. Which she was called even after her divorce.
I don't know why Anglosaxon media are so keen on Will and Kate. Imagine Belgian media calling their royal couple Phil and Til or Dutch media calling theirs Lex and Max.
And the use of last names as Parker-Bowles or Middleton. No media uses Tjessem Hoiby or De Lannoy to the Norwegian resp. Luxembourgian counterparts.
Very peculiar habits in Anglosaxon media!
The press tried to make these constructed nicknames a thing but they never caught on and eventually their use fizzled away. They're rarely used nowadays, but it does happen in the gutter press.Many years ago the Swedish princesses sometimes went by Vickan and Madde in the press but I feel like it, for the most part at least, stopped when they got married and had families of their own.
People Magazine in the US has an article posted today regarding how they will refer to HRH. https://people.com/royals/the-great-kate-debate-princess-duchess-kate-middleton/ To summarize, they will use "Princess Catherine" or "The Princess of Wales" BUT will also include "Kate Middleton" in the first paragraph for those who search that phrase. Sigh. At least they acknowledge that she prefers "Catherine"...
Ugh, there are so many errors in that. Including from the supposed "expert" at Debrett's!
At least they acknowledge that she prefers "Catherine"...
Since I learned William calls her Catherine and that in fact he wasn't being pompous about it (originally I believed everyone did call her Kate), that's what has made the most sense to me. I may throw in an occasional Kate, but I'm not calling her Princess Catherine. Those are my views.
Does anyone know when the "divorced" style became everyday usage for married royals, as Debrett's is seemingly saying? Was that pioneered by the Sussexes?
So, it's not that strange to me that she prefers "Catherine" to "Kate."
Since I learned William calls her Catherine and that in fact he wasn't being pompous about it (originally I believed everyone did call her Kate), that's what has made the most sense to me. I may throw in an occasional Kate, but I'm not calling her Princess Catherine. Those are my views.
Does anyone know when the "divorced" style became everyday usage for married royals, as Debrett's is seemingly saying? Was that pioneered by the Sussexes?
If Prince William has an investiture of Prince of Wales, what if he used the Coronet of Frederick Louis, Prince of Wales?
http://kids.kiddle.co/Image:Coronet_of_Frederick,_Prince_of_Wales.png
It occurred to me today that if Charlotte becomes Princess Royal one day, her name will flow in a pattern of princesses royal:
Mary, daughter of Charles I
Anne, daughter of George II
Charlotte, daughter of William IV
Victoria, daughter of Victoria
Louise, daughter of Edward VII
Mary, daughter of George V
Anne, daughter of Elizabeth II
...next up could be Charlotte
I wonder if George will have a daughter Victoria and a granddaughter Louise to keep the pattern going.
Charlotte of Clarence (?), daughter of William IV, was never Princess Royal. I believe she passed away as an infant.