Meghan Markle: Wedding Dress Suggestions and Musings


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
See posts with no answers
Status
Not open for further replies.
:previous: I am in total agreement, yes to the veil, absolutely no to the blusher.

1. Very few brides who wear blushers get it right. Too thick, too thin, too stiff, too limp, too raggedy edged, too embellished, doesn't match, doesn't look right . . . . .

2. If the father of the bride doesn't raise her veil, more often than not the congregation is treated to a ham-fisted groom trying very hard to be gentle and not to rip the veil off her head or knock the tiara/headpiece off centre or worse, off her head. It is not polite to giggle when this happens, invariably there is a ripple of tittering.
 
These bets are really no sign. The obsession with McQueen seems based on people making bets Meghan will follow Kate's lead. Likely from the constant articles that Meghan is copying Kate's style.

When Kate got married, the bets were 'closed on Bruce Oldfield'. :whistling:

Funny enough 'McQueen and Westwood' were ruled out for Kate by many as not her 'style' and weren't placing high in betting.
 
EloisevonLippe said:
Hello All

I'm fairly new here but just wanted to add some suggestions to the beautiful dresses proposed.

Dress 1 (bateau neckline & A-Line skirt) - https://www.magbridal.com/p-marvelous-satin-bateau-neckline-ball-gown-wedding-dress-69126.html
I think this is simple but would look amazing with a dramatic veil and the right tiara.

Dress 2 (bateau neck & ballgown skirt) - My personal favorite https://www.instagram.com/p/BdAzUPbnJ0H/
This gown is so perfect and I see it has been mentioned previously. Just wanted to put in another vote for this design with maybe a bejewelled veil.

Dress 3 (Krikor Jabotian - This is what I think of when I think of a royal princess's wedding gown) https://i.pinimg.com/564x/e7/14/8e/e7148e051c3727019b4a600c0cdfcd2f.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/5f/dc/48/5fdc48b033f441f07dffa00e21935de7.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/e9/bd/5d/e9bd5dc99a82c037658a66977470a033.jpg

Dress 4 (Elie Saab - this type of dress is a wildcard based on the minimalism that MM prefers but she has stated her love for the designer and did say she liked whimsical wedding dresses, so who knows) https://www.instagram.com/p/BTHeyiIljpf/
http://e.glbimg.com/og/ed/f/original/2017/10/09/elie-saab-bridal-inverno-2018_5.jpg

Some other beautiful dresses:
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/c2/4c/1a/c24c1ac95ba4a3802411dae27402dacd.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/1c/ba/1d/1cba1d455e50e622b9b4a660f23d08b4.jpg
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/376895062550910016/
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/b0/b3/c7/b0b3c7132fd31bdb52b1ac08b67419fd.jpg
https://n.nordstrommedia.com/ImageG..._color=FFF&format=jpeg&w=391&h=600&quality=70
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1182/9792/products/SWD0058b_400x.jpg?v=1514877358
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/b1/47/84/b14784393c71cc07c1cbec48783784a0.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/07/8f/aa/078faa8a3de65943642e11e4f9d72d57.jpg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Elements that I think would work perfectly -

Bold embellishments strategically used like this - https://i.pinimg.com/originals/cf/2b/bc/cf2bbcb602e7bd29a82c255566cf567c.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/25/6f/13/256f135bb01035f4eff9ccc9b1609385.jpg

A structured neckline, skirt and train:
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/17/23/b3/1723b3365d8cfc6ea91d2ebc784d5e84.jpg
Nothing as elaborate as this but the effect is beautiful and can be scaled down for a train -
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/11/5a/99/115a999c7e5c1a61b77a871f59e2628b.jpg

Contrasting embellishment/ unusual colour - These two go hand in hand and it would be so great to see a different colour in a Royal wedding dress for once. A pale blush or the slightest, iciest blue with metallic beading for instance. If done tastefully and in a light-handed way, this could be so stunning. Think Stephanie of Lannoy and her silver dress.
Examples: https://i.pinimg.com/564x/26/16/10/2616108d528dfdb57ae2706090aa4bc1.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/0b/a6/17/0ba6178cab7ba22b25ebd84b25c2797e.jpg

And finally, a dramatic veil if the dress is on the simpler side -
https://www.blossomveils.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/BV_Fall201714159-2.jpg
Click to expand...

Wow, lots of interesting, well thought out suggestions. I think the second bateau dress is quite lovely with simple flowing lines. I'm just not sure that long sleeves will be practical in summer. Still it seems close to Meghan's style aesthetic.

The third dress is so regal and stunning with the Jacobian-style and all-over embroidery, plus the skirt structured in a slimming fashion in front but with the large folds fanned out on either side, it really seems like a very period piece dress that goes well with historic Windsor Castle and St. George's Chapel. However, it's almost too grand for a modern princess. It would be cool if Meghan found a design that can incorporate some majestic ancient tradition details that lend unique stature, but with a modern elegant twist.

I really do not like the 4th Elie Saab dress for Meghan. The veil is interesting but not the dress styling.

The Pinterest link (third link under 'other beautiful dresses') shows a dress in the second row that actually states 'Meghan would look divine in this dress.' That one is quite nice the slimming way it is styled yet with some fullness in a variation on mermaid styling with ruffled hemline.

The pink frothy dress with voluminous folds - No. And the very structured long-sleeved dress with embroidery looks very stiff, old-fashioned and costumey - not for Meghan.

I agree that a more simply styled dress would pair well with an embellished veil. The second to last dress is very pretty with simple embellishments (it looks like a light blue tint), but the strapless bodice is out. Meghan's dress will surely have some kind of sleeves, whether cap sleeves or short sleeves and hopefully an interesting bodice. That's another reason why I love the Jacobean-styled dress #3. It really is a wow! But Meghan seems to have a simpler aesthetic and likely would not go with such all-over embroidery, even though it's so gorgeous.

Thanks for sharing!
 
Last edited:
On the issue of a blusher, I sincerely hope that this item of apparel for any bride goes the way of the corset and knee length bloomers. :D

All it does for me is remind me of the biblical story of how Jacob got hoodwinked (and in this case, the word is quite appropriate) into marrying Leah instead of his choice of Rachel. It might have worked then but there is no way in this day and age that Harry would ever be hoodwinked into anything let alone someone other than his choice of Meghan come hell or high water.

For me, definitely voting on no blusher. Ever.
 
After I saw your discussion about veil I went to do some search about veils......I am surprised that there are so many types of veil with specific name:eek:.

I am confused, blusher is referred to these extremely short veils whether it covers the face or not, or any veils that cover the bride's face no matter how long it is?
 
Thanks Countessmeout :flowers:

While I am also in team no-blusher, it seems like there is a unspoken norm or tradition as all brides in recent decade wore a blusher, so I think probably she will have one too. (Of course I hope my speculation is wrong......)
 
The traditions appears to be that royal-born brides never wore the veil over their faces, whilst brides marrying into the royal family did. This seems to have been broken by Zara.

As a fashion element, I think the veil covering the face adds an interesting and romantic touch and so I wouldn't mind if Meghan did the same thing. But I think she has the choice and it wouldn't or shouldn't be an issue if she chose not to cover her face.

All I ask is that she wears a full-length veil and for it to be voluminous rather than flat!
 
Countessmeout said:
I still think people are betting on McQueen because 'well Kate did, so Meghan....' I find it highly unlikely for that very reason. There is already too much comparison between the two. The last thing Meghan needs or will want is a permanent 'who did it better'.
Click to expand...

Agree completely. Everybody except Alexander McQueen
BYe Bine
 
Jacknch said:
The traditions appears to be that royal-born brides never wore the veil over their faces, whilst brides marrying into the royal family did. This seems to have been broken by Zara.

As a fashion element, I think the veil covering the face adds an interesting and romantic touch and so I wouldn't mind if Meghan did the same thing. But I think she has the choice and it wouldn't or shouldn't be an issue if she chose not to cover her face.

All I ask is that she wears a full-length veil and for it to be voluminous rather than flat!
Click to expand...

Well, Zara might not break any tradition if it's the royal-born brides with HRH Princess never wore blusher......but who knows, maybe everything is just a coincidence:lol:. The tradition stuff may get clearer after two royal weddings in this year.

Most of the royal brides didn't get their blushers right (MARG's description about royal blushers is very accurate!) but I don't mind to be surprised by a high quality blusher......If Meghan (or Eugenie) wants to wear a blusher I hope she gets some references from Grace's or Charlane's (Monegasque brides' are the only two blushers I think it's on point).

And yes, full length veil please. Don't need to be so long but at least floor length.
 
With all due respect to McQueen, Temperly, and Jenny Packham. ..but they don't need the exposure.

It would be great for the honor go to a struggling or up and coming designer that could really benefit from the publicity.
 
My bias against small designers is that they may not have the resources to produce a flawlessly executed dress. Perhaps the way around that would be announce the designer in advance so that then that designer can bring in outside resources - presumably there are enough craftspeople who are independent and can be tapped into for this project.
 
Alisa said:
With all due respect to McQueen, Temperly, and Jenny Packham. ..but they don't need the exposure.

It would be great for the honor go to a struggling or up and coming designer that could really benefit from the publicity.
Click to expand...


:flowers: This is exactly how I feel as well. What better way to use her influence than to help a smaller brand or new designer.
 
I hope she wears the bateau neckline on an a line or modified a line dress ...that neckline looks wonderful on her.


LaRae
 
Alisa said:
With all due respect to McQueen, Temperly, and Jenny Packham. ..but they don't need the exposure.

It would be great for the honor go to a struggling or up and coming designer that could really benefit from the publicity.
Click to expand...

Forgive me but I have an issue with people putting criteria on Meghan or any bride. This is her day and her dress decisions should be influenced only by her desires not where the designer was born or if they need exposure. I do understand why there was criteria for Princess Elizabeth's dress but I think some of these ideas about who should make it and where they were born is cumbersome; Meghan shouldn't worry about helping any designer. Why so much politics about a dress? If the best designer turned out to be a rich famous designer in Korea is that really such a big deal?
 
Last edited:
Some dresses in a style I can see her wearing--
https://www.theknot.com/fashion/opulento-two-by-rosa-clara-wedding-dress
https://www.theknot.com/fashion/5372-blu-by-madeline-gardner-wedding-dress
https://www.theknot.com/fashion/m1410z-mia-solano-wedding-dress
https://www.theknot.com/fashion/c119-aurelia-amare-couture-by-crystal-richard-wedding-dress
https://www.theknot.com/fashion/2119-casablanca-bridal-wedding-dress
https://www.theknot.com/fashion/rb010-rb010sh-romona-by-romona-keveza-wedding-dress
https://www.theknot.com/fashion/8955-justin-alexander-wedding-dress
https://www.theknot.com/fashion/cano-aire-barcelona-wedding-dress
https://www.theknot.com/fashion/narciso-rosa-clara-wedding-dress

There were some others I liked parts of--either the bodice or skirt but not the dress as a whole. Or they weren't enough dress for the venue.
 
Last edited:
I am sorry but dripping in lace doesn't really fit the style she has said she has.

"Classic and simple is the name of the game, perhaps with a modern twist. I personally prefer wedding dresses that are whimsical or subtly romantic.”
Click to expand...

Those lace dresses are 'romantic' but they aren't simple, modern.

The top trend for 2018 are the cape gowns, which I am in love with, and such a great way to get around the no bare shoulders. But I know I will be disappointed, especially as it is highly likely on a veil and veil/cape not a good mix.

Other trends for 2018 I don't see being adopted: black dress/accents, or blue, short, pants, bare shoulders or gloves.

But pearls are popular for 2018:

Mermaid Bateau Illusion Neckline Low Back Lace Beaded Wedding Dress With Pearls

https://www.weddingomania.com/winter-wedding-dresses/pictures/80727/

High necked

https://www.gemgrace.com/4579-class...train-satin-wedding-dress-with-open-back.html

https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/65654107041601023/
 
I think it is possible Meghan may surprise everyone with her wedding dress choice. Her engagement photos dress was not simple or sleek.
 
O-H Anglophile said:
I think it is possible Meghan may surprise everyone with her wedding dress choice.
Click to expand...

I agree. Meghan had the non-fussy, simple, modern dress the first time, as well as a simple destination beach wedding (thus fulfilling her CBK ''wedding goals'') . I think she might go totally opposite this time around and I expect many people will be surprised with her choice. I’m just hoping it’s not another lace dress, I’m really over those.
 
Alisa said:
With all due respect to McQueen, Temperly, and Jenny Packham. ..but they don't need the exposure.

It would be great for the honor go to a struggling or up and coming designer that could really benefit from the publicity.
Click to expand...
None of these brands ever needed exposure from Kate or Meghan. McQueen has been a legendary, icon brand waaaaaay before Kate's wedding dress even came along. Temperly and Packham have never been in the same league as McQueen, but they certainly never needed the exposure in the first place to survive.
 
Alisa said:
With all due respect to McQueen, Temperly, and Jenny Packham. ..but they don't need the exposure.

It would be great for the honor go to a struggling or up and coming designer that could really benefit from the publicity.
Click to expand...

That would be very risky!

Didn't Diana do that with the Emmanuels?
And look what they came up with!
 
Yes she did and it wasn't the nicest dress I've seen....and I don't think Diana had enough confidence at that point in her life (or fashion sense) to correct them.


LaRae
 
Even if Meghan does go with a well known fashion house that doesn’t mean it won’t bring the designer major accolades.

Sarah Burton got an OBE, several fashion awards and an honorary doctorate out of designing Catherine’s dress.

That’s why I hope at the very least Meghan picks a British name
 
Rudolph I am pretty sure she's going to go with a British designer. It would cause a hue and cry if she didn't. She's already been wearing Brit designers even before all this so she is somewhat familiar with them already.



LaRae
 
Mirabel said:
That would be very risky!

Didn't Diana do that with the Emmanuels?
And look what they came up with!
Click to expand...
Too true, did Sarah Victoria and Countess Stephanie choose veteran designers who knew what they were doing?
 
Mirabel said:
That would be very risky!

Didn't Diana do that with the Emmanuels?
And look what they came up with!
Click to expand...

I agree. There is a time to give new designers a boost and you wedding dress is not that time, imo.


XeniaCasaraghi said:
Too true, did Sarah Victoria and Countess Stephanie choose veteran designers who knew what they were doing?
Click to expand...

Are you talking Crown Princess Victoria and Hereditary Grand Duchess Stephanie?
If you are, then yes. They both chose experienced designers, who had been worn by royals before – Pär Engsheden and Elie Saab.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

CrownPrincessJava
Old Fashion Discussion Part 3
Replies
4
Views
1K
priyanka
P
Marengo
Tiaras and Jewels for the Next Generation, Part 2
Replies
13
Views
1K
An Ard Ri
An Ard Ri
iceflower
Gender, names & godparents for Princess Beatrice & Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi's second child
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
JGio
J
Marengo
  • Locked
Charles III: Coronation Information and Musings - Part 2
15 16 17
Replies
501
Views
57K
Marengo
Marengo
iceflower
Princess Charlene's Fashion and Style Part 20: September 2024 -
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
An Ard Ri
An Ard Ri

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom