princess olga
Serene Highness
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2005
- Messages
- 1,282
- City
- san francisco
- Country
- United States
I don't necessarily disagree with that, although I'd like to give Albert the benefit of the doubt--for now.Ghislaine said:Princess Olga:
Which would make Albert just as borderline hypocrite.
Charles and Laurent, I agree on. Charles was hawking organic foods and establishing his own organic farm way before, as you say, the environment was "hot".Ghislaine said:Frederik of Denmark, Charles of the UK, Laurent from Belgium (admittedly not a crown prince), Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands does everything concerning water.
And Laurent, well, there are a ton of examples indeed, that show his commitment to the environment in general and animals in particular.
I get the impression Charles and Laurent are genuine in these efforts to at least get attention to the plight of our dying, overpopulated planet.
Then Alexander. Yes, he's all about water, but with him, there's more the impression that he's more in it to make sure everyone, as in, every human, in the world, has equal access to water--that's a bit different than saving the environment. A Charles or Laurent or even an Albert, Alexander ain't. And anyway, he's said to favor private corporation solutions as to the distribution of water--a solution I wholeheartedly <dis>agree with.
And Frederik--I don't know enough about his efforts to really know what I'm talking about--for some reason, whenever I tune in to what he's doing, he's always on a boat participating in some sailing competition or other. For some reason I don't get the impression he takes whatever it is he stands for very seriously, although I don't doubt his commitment to his young family.
I completely agree, but that doesn't mean they cannot try and pull a "Charles" or "Laurent". Albert, you're right, should take a page or two from these princes' books.Ghislaine said:Royalty is, IMO, not the most green profession anyway. That's not their fault, it's more a sort of necessary evil.