Perhaps English is not this lady's first language? You seem to be giving her a very torrid time for merely expressing an opinion.
Why not just say that you don't agree instead of demanding that she apply irrefutable evidence to satisfy you? And, it's quite obvious that this poster is not speaking 'on behalf of the entire world on that matter'. She doesn't even present herself as doing that.
Actually, I can see this lady's point quite well, without requiring evidence down to the minutiae. There exists anecdotal evidence that William is losing popularity and that Harry is more popular. But whether or not that is accurate is another matter; I guess it depends upon the source and how one defines 'popular'. William has been known as being stubborn, amongst other things. I have actually met William, personally, and I do like him on face value. But I still think Harry would be the more genuine of the two. It's just an opinion, of course. I'm not going to provide you with evidence of what is merely my opinion.
I don't say that, because IMO that is rude and I have asked the questions because I want the answers, and if the poster can provide answers that change my mind on this matter, then I welcome them.
I see the point that the poster is trying to make, what I was asking is where the point came from, like I said above if someone can change my mind I welcome it.
Oh yes I have read many a book about William and how he was incredible stubborn when he was a child, especially when it came to the paps. I've met both the wales boys, my mother has met Harry incredible briefly when he was little and they are both wonderful, they make the family proud. Now I was not asking the other poster evidence for their opinion, I was asking evidence for the information they were stating as fact. Because if it is a fact, there has to be evidence for it?
For instance
Harry is more popular at the moment because most people like him better than his brother.
The poster hasn't said anything about this statement being an opinion, they are stating it as fact, which is why I asked if there had been a pole to tell them this information? If there had I have missed it and would have liked to have seen it.
Lumutqueen, I find it very odd that, when 'defending' Kate you always attack other posters for acting like their opinions are facts but you're not above doing the same thing.
Okay here we go i'm going to have to split this up because you've wrote a fair bit. If you think that I attack other posters when writing, then thats just the way I write things, and my apologies, I hadn't realised my writing came across in that way.
There is still no proof she is there on a full-time basis and the reports who claim she is are also the reports saying she has quit her job (a job we don't have any proof she still has, either), so how did you come to the conclusion that 'she is working for her parents at the moment and living with William in Anglessey'. Would that be, err... an opinion and you in fact don't have any idea what she is doing exactly? Oh please, what a pathetic lie.
Your right, there is no proof that she still works there for her parents, but would are we every actually going to find that out? This probably contradicts something I have said a long the lines.
Reporters have a habit on changing there minds when they think the mood of the country is altering IMO.
Ahh, that is my mistake, I meant to write that "We've been told that she is working for her parents at the moment, this is all we can go on", I realise that I have missed out a fair few words but I was typing quick and my head was only thinking about the words that stood out. There you have me. I have gone back an edited my post, I did this prior to noticing you replied to my post.
Never mind that Chelsy has been either in S.-A. or in Leeds during most of her courtship with Harry so she would not physically be able to party non-stop with him. Even if you count the pictures that do exist of them exiting clubs, there are four times as much of William and Kate.
Even when she was at leeds, she was picture out, perhaps not every night, but she was out. And before that when Chelsy was not at Leeds Uni, she was out with Harry a fair bit. I will try and find some articles.
Four times as much? Didn't know it was that many, and Harry is always the one who is called the party boy? Interesting.
I agree totally with that part. That idea that the Wales boys don't have a real career because they have time out to do their royal duties or because they are only pictured during their leave is ridiculous.
They both work hard.
Something positive about what I wrote, the assumption that all the boys, and both Chelsy and Harry do is party hard is wrong.
It's a very shallow point to argue about but actually GQ, who named him coolest, isn't a teenybopper publication. And I don't think places like Huffington Post (among other adult websites) are run over by teenage girls either, and yet it seems to be the popular opinion over there that Harry is the more attractive of the two.
Let's be honest, very few women find balding heads and horsey looks the height of sexyness.Is that a real question?
I didn't know that GQ named him the coolest, I have only ever seen the magazine on the selves, a lot of "teenybopper" newspapers over here have always talked about Harry being the sexiest, and when you watch events that the boys are at especially the James Bond premiere, I must admit there were a lot of girls screaming for Harry and not William. Horsey looks? I'd never thought William looked like a horse.
If so, I direct you to his wikipedia page, as well as to his current event threads in this very forum. Very informative.
I may have interpretated what the poster wrote in the wrong way, but I thought he/she was saying that Harry had a career and a life out of the royal work that he does, that is why I asked. I am unsure if I am wrong as the poster is yet to reply.
I hope I wasn't too agressive, my apologies if I was.