General questions and Forum issues


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
See posts with no answers
Where are the fashion polls??? :ermm:

Yes they are but i see that they are stop uptaded back June. No fashion Polls anymore?

Good to know that the Fashion Polls are still ON!!?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I believe they're at the start of the various fashion threads. I'm not one that overly follows fashion so this is just my guess. ?
 
We've put the fashion polls on hold, as the picture hosting site we've used has increasingly caused problems. There were too many glitches and annoying pop-ups. So far we haven't found another photo site to host the embedded photos, so at this point in time we can't say whether or when or in what kind of form the polls will be back. But it's good to know that there is an abiding interest in the polls! :flowers:
 
I keep getting a message form Google that says this forum is "Not Secure" anyone else getting this? Should I be concerned?
 
Zaira said:
I keep getting a message form Google that says this forum is "Not Secure" anyone else getting this? Should I be concerned?
Click to expand...

The site does not seem to be forcing (or to support) the use of https. Basically, all the information that goes back and forth between your computer and the site is not encrypted. The reason that it changes from the grey "info" notice that you're not secure (which you get when you're just reading) to a red exclamation symbol (when you make a post) is that it's aware that you're sending information and is warning you in case you're sending something sensitive.

In practice, for a site like the forums, the risk is pretty low; once you're logged in, you're not entering your financial information or any personal information.

The login page does appear to force https, which means your login and password are (AFAICT) sent using encryption.

So, TL/DR -- the risk isn't huge, unless you're actually someone who'd get in trouble for reading and posting on these forums AND someone happened to be snooping your traffic to and from the site.
 
Zaira said:
I keep getting a message form Google that says this forum is "Not Secure" anyone else getting this? Should I be concerned?
Click to expand...

As noted by hel in an earlier post last year google began to push websites to use https instead of http as a security update. A few months ago they began to actually began to display that little red triangle;"not secure" on browser address lines.

We hand coded an update to make the LOGIN page https. This is the page where user credentials are passed and the only sensitive data we store. Once a member has logged in the site reverts to http (and the alert begins to display in browsers). Using https on all pages actually breaks some things the forum. Offsite links and hosted images no longer work, ads don't display, photos, etc.

So... as you login the page is secure (https) but once you have logged in the regular site is http. Since no login/pass info is being sent on these pages we believe this is safe and reasonable. There's little we can do to change this until we move to a new forum software platform which eventually we will have to do.

You can read more about the google alerts here: https://www.wired.com/story/google-chrome-https-not-secure-label/
 
Janet H said:
As noted by hel in an earlier post last year google began to push websites to use https instead of http as a security update. A few months ago they began to actually began to display that little red triangle;"not secure" on browser address lines.

We hand coded an update to make the LOGIN page https. This is the page where user credentials are passed and the only sensitive data we store. Once a member has logged in the site reverts to http (and the alert begins to display in browsers). Using https on all pages actually breaks some things the forum. Offsite links and hosted images no longer work, ads don't display, photos, etc.

So... as you login the page is secure (https) but once you have logged in the regular site is http. Since no login/pass info is being sent on these pages we believe this is safe and reasonable. There's little we can do to change this until we move to a new forum software platform which eventually we will have to do.

You can read more about the google alerts here: https://www.wired.com/story/google-chrome-https-not-secure-label/
Click to expand...

Yeah, the need to move everything to https seems.. overblown. On a leisure web forum like this, even the risk of the login page would be mitigated if we knew everyone was following proper password hygiene and using a different password for each website.
 
Fashion Polls?

Really, really missing the fashion polls....
 
Is there a way to block members so that their posts are not visible (to me) when (I am) logged in?
 
Thank you so much, Marengo :flowers: I already feel my blood pressure decreasing in certain threads!
 
Hello,
a quick question with regards to the forums are there hidden sub forums which require a certain number of posts to gain access to the sub forums? For example the Ruling Families of the United Arab Emirates forum has 125 viewers but these viewers don’t seem to be equally dispersed between the threads apparent to me.

Many thanks,

Marjor
 
We have a admin/moderator forum that is accessibele for the mod. team only. And there is a subforum for the people that write/wrote for the blog. They use the subforum as a convenient tool to write/edit these blog posts.

Other than that there are no 'hidden' forums :flowers:.
 
Thank you so much for your reply and the clarification Marengo
 
I was wondering, in terms of the"rankings" of posters-e.g. "Newbie, Commoner, Serene Highness" etc that appear for users, is there any merit in looking at how these "rankings" are given out. Without dragging the Sussex's into everything, during a back and forth in a Sussex thread I started to think the other poster, with a higher ranking, must know more, be more familiar with the forum etc but when looking at all their posts almost every single one has been in a Sussex thread. Is there not some merit from higher rankings / ratings coming from interactions across a range of threads, even if within the same RF sub heading (I get this is probably not possible technically but hey). It may help give more balance to some of the more difficult threads
 
Its my understanding that the ranks or "titles" under a posters name reflect the amount of posts they have made in total to the threads overall. The count does not include areas such as Member's Corner but pertains only to the threads discussing royalty.

Its no indication of how much one knows or how informed one is on a vast array of different royal families and subjects but based on participation alone. Trust me, this is still my favorite site to check off my daily "learn something new today" box. :D
 
tommy100 said:
I was wondering, in terms of the"rankings" of posters-e.g. "Newbie, Commoner, Serene Highness" etc that appear for users, is there any merit in looking at how these "rankings" are given out. Without dragging the Sussex's into everything, during a back and forth in a Sussex thread I started to think the other poster, with a higher ranking, must know more, be more familiar with the forum etc but when looking at all their posts almost every single one has been in a Sussex thread. Is there not some merit from higher rankings / ratings coming from interactions across a range of threads, even if within the same RF sub heading (I get this is probably not possible technically but hey). It may help give more balance to some of the more difficult threads
Click to expand...

The "rankings" underneath poster's usernames is, as Osipi mentioned, linked to the amount of posts the individual poster has made in applicable forums at TRF (all forums except for the Member's Corner forums count towards your post count). The higher your post count, the "higher" ranked title you have. The titles are something the original admin team set-up and has no bearing on any interactions / etc. They are really there for fun.

These are the titles, and the required post count levels:

Newbie: 10 or fewer posts
Commoner: 11 to 50 posts
Gentry: from 51 to 100 posts
Aristocracy: 101 to 250 posts
Nobility: 251 to 500 posts
Courtier: 501 to 1,000 posts
Serene Highness: 1,001 to 1,500 posts
Royal Highness: 1,501 to 2,000 posts
Heir Presumptive: 2,001 to 3,000 posts
Heir Apparent: 3,001 to 6,000 posts
Majesty: 6,001 to 10,000 posts
Imperial Majesty: 10,000 posts and above
 
Last edited:
JessRuiz thanks for the explanation.
I find TRF a very interesting and informative forum. It is the best forum on monarchy and royalty.
 
Pop up problem

In the last few weeks I've had a blank pop up appear (laptop user) at the bottom of my screen, every few pages. It's really annoying having to close it down each time. Am I doing something wrong? I like to open several links at once.

Thanks. (Sorry; not sure where I should post questions like this.)
 
:previous:

I'm facing a similar problem since some weeks now, and we haven't found an explanation or solution yet..
 
Same here, it pops up on the log-in page like a blank advert pop-up and remains after logging in. Maybe an issue with advert settings or something.
 
:previous:

Oh, that one, yes, that's most likely the one janet14 meant. Then I'm actually having problems with two pop-ups..
 
I've also had this pop up when I log into TRF. Totally blank and even right clicking doesn't give me any information why its there. I close it out and am OK until the next time I log into TRF and there it is again.
 
For me it happens every four or five times but not every time I log in.
 
This has been on going for several weeks maybe. Is it an advertisement of some sort?
 
Got that one too, but not always.
 
Has the function for deleting posts disappeared? I looked for it after posting a message in the incorrect thread.
 
The glitch seems to have been fixed. The delete button is back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Janet H
Forum Update - We're back! Ask your questions here.
2 3 4
Replies
96
Views
19K
Kaye1850
Kaye1850
M
Family Bylaws Concerning the House Law of the House of Luxembourg-Nassau
Replies
1
Views
2K
Tatiana Maria
T
M
Laws of the House of Grimaldi
Replies
3
Views
2K
Tatiana Maria
T
A
Future and Popularity of the Thai Monarchy
2 3 4
Replies
99
Views
12K
Tatiana Maria
T
ROYAL NORWAY
Prime Ministers, and the constitutional role of the Norwegian Monarch
2 3
Replies
70
Views
11K
ROYAL NORWAY
ROYAL NORWAY

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom