nwinther, my guess is, that they changed the colour balance for the cover, does the cover of BB look the same when having a look at it in a store?
Haven't seen it yet, but a week or two ago, Mary was on the cover. She looked like a well-fed, sweating christmas-pig covered in a thin layer of strawberry-jam. Not very attractive or charming at all.
The reason for the "jam" is that someone haven't managed to remove the magenta (or add green). Usually this happens when an image is underexposed and you have to choose between a green or magenta tone. The solution is, of course, to find another, better, image.
In this case, we have another problem with the exposion or color-temperature. It's not unusual that images taken under extreme lighting conditions will make a person pale. This is compensatet for by adding yellow or red - and sometimes it'll work. But at other times, it'll make them look orange.
I've made plenty of pictures of dark-skinned people (Sri Lankans etc.) that want to sent images back home, showing their new life. They can't get the images bright enough as they want to look lighter-skinned. Problem is that when you brighten an image, the color-temperature suddenly shows itself, and instead of making dark-skinned people "whiter", it makes them blue-toned and overexposed. To a professional it looks absolutely horrid.
The opposite is sometimes the case for light-skinned folk. We want to look tan, but since you can't add "tan" you mix in the yellow and red (removing blue and green). The result is rarely any good. People look diseased rather than tan.