This is like when H&M felt able to say in Court they hadn't collaborated with Scobie because technically THEY hadn't, they'd jus authorised their press guy at the time to do so. I honestly imagine them moaning and leaking their side of things to "friends" who they know are talking to Scobie, probably their press team as well. In their mind they are being truthful saying they didn't collaborate even if the end result is the same.
The Times interview with Scobie is...interesting. He has moved to California as well (not that far from H&M) and gladly posed for the sort of professional photoshoot pics celebs usually do for the article. He denies any cosmetic surgery and that he is a friend or mouthpiece of the couple. He is also talks about his own racist incident in an early job and how much impact that had on him.
I find it interesting how all his interviews so far seem to have been done some weeks ago, before the leaking of phone calls to Charles circulated - so he can't be asked about that.
The book also reveals the content of a letter from Meghan to the King about her concerns over racist language used (seemingly she isn't that bothered about this letter being leaked) and that Meghan personally called Omid after he received abuse online.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-f...wo-members-royal-household-child-skin-colour/
Times article -https://archive.ph/vBkzP