Leslie2006
Nobility
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2006
- Messages
- 444
- City
- Seattle
- Country
- United States
I wonder when they'll announce the baby's name? I hope soon! I'm getting impatient! lol
I wonder when they'll announce the baby's name? I hope soon! I'm getting impatient! lol
I remember that time frame now it took Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson forever to name Princess Beatrice.
DM is at it already....not going to post the article here cause I don't want to spoil the mood but typical of them...
CTV did a small new story on it..they went to her dad but his answer was "my daughter made me swear I wouldn't speak to the press.." The announcers began laughing saying "She's trained him well"
The royals don't 'sell' their events like that. They believe that the private photos that are released should be available to everyone and not exclusive.I don't understand why the senior members of the Royal Family were so upset over Peter and Autumn sharing their wedding photos.
"sharing" is a polite euphemism for selling. Hello! paid them about £500,000 for the exclusive rights to the wedding.I don't understand why the senior members of the Royal Family were so upset over Peter and Autumn sharing their wedding photos.
Ya that's the one but I was too happy for the couple to post that and spoil the happy mood. But ya basically though I'm sure we'll prob get something when the couple leave the hospital I doubt they'll have to go down that route again.Queen's first great grandchild as Peter Phillips' wife Autumn Kelly has baby girl | Mail Online
Is this the article you were referring to?
If they do it is because the magazines believe people will buy the magazine as a result. Simple economics really.
Ya that's the one but I was too happy for the couple to post that and spoil the happy mood. But ya basically though I'm sure we'll prob get something when the couple leave the hospital I doubt they'll have to go down that route again.
Iluvbertie said:The royals don't 'sell' their events like that. They believe that the private photos that are released should be available to everyone and not exclusive.
I was watching the news here in Australia this morning and they were commenting on the fact that Mary makes sure that photos of Christian and Isabella were available to everyone.
Peter definitely went against royal protocol in selling exclusive access to his wedding.
Does anyone know if the newest member of the Phillips family received a gun salute? Do they still do this in the UK when a member of the Royal Family is born? I haven't been able to find out. Just curious. Can't wait to see the pics of the new baby girl.
I remembering reading that Peter, even though he was untitled and born a commoner he was still given a gun salute on the day of his birth. Still curious to know if his baby daughter received one.I don't know for sure but I suspect they do still do the gun salutes but I wouldn't have thought they would for Peter's baby (due to his not having a Royal title & the baby itself also not having a Royal title etc). I reckon they probably will only do salutes now when/if William has kids as they would be the next line of succession & all that.
I don't think,don't forget that Peter was at the time of his birth the son of Princess Royal and the first grand-child of the Queen,but now his daughter is not a daughter of Prince,despite the fact that she is of royal bloodI remembering reading that Peter, even though he was untitled and born a commoner he was still given a gun salute on the day of his birth. Still curious to know if his baby daughter received one.