cowarth
Nobility
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2006
- Messages
- 326
- City
- NA
- Country
- United States
Why are Canada and Australia so important?
BeatrixFan said:Well anybody can be an ambassador if they have a silver tongue and know what fork to use.
What is the political situation in that part of Africa? How will it effect Harry's work? What is a Govenor-General, is that like a president?And how long before the work becomes political?
Princess Margaret was born in a different era, Harry has to live with the modern expectations of what a royal IS and IS NOT in today's society.It's hypocritical I know but it was alright for Princess Margaret, it won't be for Harry. IMO of course.
You really don't have to have an occupation to be happy, healthy or worthwhile.iowabelle said:I agree entirely, BeatrixFan. Harry can't be allowed to become the male version of Princess Margaret. It's just not healthy for an adult to have no occupation.
Well we all know that Africa's poverty problem is as a result of corrupt politicians and other political problems. Now Harry can't possibly tackle that sort of issue so all he can do is get his hands dirty and I don't see a Prince doing that. The minute he criticised African politicians, he'd be ripped to shreds by the left wingers.What is the political situation in that part of Africa? How will it effect Harry's work?
iowabelle said:It's just not healthy for an adult to have no occupation.
cowarth said:What is a Govenor-General, is that like a president?
chrissy57 said:As an Aussie I can assure you that there is no way Harry would be accepted as the Govenor-General down here.
We wouldn't accept his father when the republican faction was much smaller but now that it represents the majority of Australians (yes I know the result of the referendum but that result reflected far more dissatisfaction with the way the President was to be chosen and not on the straight issue of whether we should become a republic as well as the fact that the idea didn't have bipartisan support - our present PM is an avowed Monarchist but the next PM, whether Labor or Liberal will be a republican).
It would be the final straw.
The monarchists are now able to argue that our effective Head of State - i.e. the person who does the actual work - is an Aussie. To put a Brit in that position would push us to a republic even faster than we are moving now.
Aussies very much want one of their own in the top job not some foreign prince. As much as I am a monarchist I certainly wouldn't want someone -who hasn't a commitment to this country in the job of Govenor-General.
Elspeth said:The traditional role for male royals who haven't entered the armed services has been a civil service job in the Foreign Office, but that does tend to require a university education, which he doesn't have.
cowarth said:Where would Harry go in the civil service?
He could be a camp counselor
cowarth said:He could be a camp counselor, he loves children.
Sister Morphine said:I'm sorry, but I disagree. There are some people who have no real "job" to speak of, yet they lead fulfilling and enriched lives regardless. I agree that Harry should find a career that is meaningful to him, but not because he'd be viewed as "unhealthy" otherwise.
cowarth said:Teach disadvantaged kids how to play rugby or polo.