The Department of Defense has stressed that the Second Chamber (the Lower House) knew about these costs because in September the Prime Minister has sent a letter to the Chamber, to inform about overspending up to € 223.000,-- Because the additional costs could be covered inside the Defense Budget (the maintenance is done by the
Rijkswerf in Den Helder), no extra posts were needed inside the Budget.
The story "maintenance of the
De Groene Draeck tonnes more expensive" is true but not new anyway. Everybody could see in the State Budget that in 2014 the standard annual maintenance has been raised from € 60.000,-- to € 95.000,--. This because the standard annual budgeted sum of € 60.000,-- was structurally overspend. So the new budgeted sum of € 95.000,-- should cover that, to get it more in line with reality.
The hullabaloo is about the years 2011-2012-2013 when this overspending apparently was not specifically accounted to the Second Chamber but was compensated elsewhere on the Defense Budget.
The maintenance costs of the
De Groene Draeck are beyond belief. I have the idea that the
Rijkswerf -without any problem- attributes the most ridiculous posts to the
De Groene Draeck. Maybe the State should let the maintenance of the
De Groene Draeck be done by a commercial wharf, but that would be painful for the own
Rijkswerf, exposing it as an arch-expensive, in-efficient and badly managed state service. The maintenance of the naval fleet is also always and always overspent and the costs are astronomic. It is possible that when the State gives the
De Groene Draeck and the naval fleet to wharfs in France, Germany or Poland, that the costs are easily halved...
„Kamer wist van meerkosten Groene Draeck†- Binnenland - RD.nl