pama said:It will never happen
I'm sorry, did I miss something?
Has it been announced that Albert would be actually marrying anyone at all? I don't think it has...
pama said:It will never happen
pama said://http://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2006/04/24/sundayservice/ Just a note I think it is so great for the royal house of luxembourg to be at prince louis new born baby christening Maybe monaco royal house should do the same for baby Alex they should not be a shame of Alex he is so cute
Hoo poor poor PA a billion dollar prince .evil Nicole all unwanted conception should be what? Children are a gift from GodMyAdia said:I think there are lots of differences between the Monaco and Luxembourg cases. The main difference is the type of relationship that Albert and Nicole had and that of Louis and Tess, especially when the respected children were conceived and born. I really do not want to get into becasue I am so tired of this subject. I posted similar thoughts in another messageboard.
Yes, I think most people would like to see Albert have a relationship with his son. Albert has said that his son will be a part of his PRIVATE life. Has he done that? I do not know. There seems to be a group of people who wants to see Alexandre waving from the balcony of the Princly Palace ...I do not see that happening anytime soon people.
Here's a post I placed on another message board in response to someone's same remark that Monaco should have done as in Luxembourg (concerning the baptismal).
************************
I think one of the major differences between the Monaco and the Luxembourg case is the relationship between the couples, especially the circumstances of the the child's conception. The relationship between Nicole & Albert seems totally different between the relationship between Louis & Tess (although we do not know much about this couple's relationship). Whether you agree or not that it should not matter, the bonding between a man and his child really does depend on the manner a child was conceived and brought into the world. With women it's different.
Normally, people choose with whom and when they decide to bring children into this world. Most people will agree that there is a special immediate bond between Felipe & Lenor; Phillippe & his children, W-A and his children, Fred & Mary, etc because they choose their mates, choose when to marry and proabbly chose when to conceive. I'm sure the bond started before the child was born. There is a mutual loving relationship between these couples. This was definitely not the case with Albert and Nicole. Here's an extreme example: A man had a one night stand with a woman and then nine months later he founds out that he has a child. I doubt if anyone expects that man to have an instant bond with the child (although people may want him to), include the child in his family gathering, or even rush to the church to baptize him.
Like it or not, Alexandre did not come into this world as all the other royal children did. So, do not be surprised that he is not waving from the balcony or around a baptimal as other offsprings of royal men do. However, Albert has an opportunity to build a relationship with his son. I hope he is spending time with his son in private. I know he mentioned last fall during an interview that he hadn't seen his son in months becasue of Nicole's attitude towards him. Obviously, if Albert wanted to spend time alone with his son he would have. The question is does he want to. I think he is letting his disdain for Nicole affect his feelings towards his son.
But, my question to you is if Albert does spend quality PRIVATE time with his son, will that be satisfactory for you? Or, do you think it is required that we have a public view of his relationship with his son?
******Below is an excerpt from a post that stated Albert has not spent anytime with his son in over a year (how do they know, I asked? They know someone who knows someone who knows ....Albert) ********
The night Alexandre was conceived, based on Nicole's own interview, the relationship was over (if you want to even call it a true relationship). I treally do believe that Nicole thought having Albert's child would bring Albert closer towards her. Hopefully, she knows now how mistaken she was. I think there are some people who do not want to see this relationship for what it really was. I think there are a core group of people that have bought into the glorified tale that Nicole tried to spin on her "5-year relationship" with Prince Albert. I do not want to get into a debate about this, so I won't say what I see the relationship as. If you really see the relationship for what it truly was, then you shouldn't be surprised that Albert has basically shunned this kid. Which is truly unfortunate because I think Albert and Alexandre will suffer in the long run.
pama said:HOO poor poor Albert A billioin dollar prince.... the evil Nicole. Children are a gift from God, what are you saying all unwanted conception should be what ?
MyAdia said:Yes, I think most people would like to see Albert have a relationship with his son. Albert has said that his son will be a part of his PRIVATE life. Has he done that? I do not know.
you are so right I do think he is ashame of him he is so good with stephanie kids You guys need to think about this and ask your self why he think Alex should be kept out of the puplic eye This is 2006 there is no more room for race to be a facter in todays world.Iam so disappointed in PA he talk about crime against children yet he does not pratice what he preach. I am waiting for his perfect love child to be presented, baby CW, PA yark with CW grand ma standing next to them imagine that guys.BurberryBrit said:I think that if he had more of a public relationship with his son, people would maybe let the issue go...
BurberryBrit said:...And after reading about the Luxembourg child born out of wedlock and even Stephanie's kids, it seems like Alex is being shunned and it makes me wonder if the shame has anything to do with his race. It's fine that Alex is getting money and will never want for anything, but a boy needs a father. And if he's only seeing Alex in private, he will grow up to wonder why his father is hiding him. He may even grow up to feel inferior. . .
pama said:you are so right I do think he is ashame of him he is so good with stephanie kids You guys need to think about this and ask your self why he think Alex should be kept out of the puplic eye This is 2006 there is no more room for race to be a facter in todays world.
BurberryBrit said:And after reading about the Luxembourg child born out of wedlock and even Stephanie's kids, it seems like Alex is being shunned and it makes me wonder if the shame has anything to do with his race. It's fine that Alex is getting money and will never want for anything, but a boy needs a father. And if he's only seeing Alex in private, he will grow up to wonder why his father is hiding him. He may even grow up to feel inferior. . .
BurberryBrit said:I think that if he had more of a public relationship with his son, people would maybe let the issue go...
Elspeth said:I think it has more to do with Albert's position than with race. The other cases you mention are both younger siblings whose children don't stand to succeed to a throne (at least, not unless large numbers of other people predecease them). They have the luxury of being able to acknowledge illegitimate children without having to worry about who is and isn't their heir.
BurberryBrit said:Yes, I agree. I never meant to suggest that race was the only factor. Because I don't think the Grimaldi's are in any way racist. But my mind does wonder if that is perhaps a part of the reason. . .since other people might disapprove.
jabilo said:i also agree that he should allow himself to be seen once in a while with him in public.
jabilo said:I have asked this before, the poor boy is not even mentioned in his credentials on the official palace website. There is so much written about him yet it does not mention anywhere his own son. .
GOT FOG? said:He still is his legit son. No matter how he came to be. He's a human being & should be treated as such, not as some unwanted thing.
I still don't understand why PA can't see him son w/o Nicole being around. Are arrangements like that not done in Paris/MC>
jabilo said:I have asked this before, the poor boy is not even mentioned in his credentials on the official palace website. There is so much written about him yet it does not mention anywhere his own son. .
GOT FOG? said:He still is his legit son. No matter how he came to be. He's a human being & should be treated as such, not as some unwanted thing.
I still don't understand why PA can't see him son w/o Nicole being around. Are arrangements like that not done in Paris/MC>
Princess BellyFlop said:Alex is a oups, an accident that his lovely mother planned on PA so she could get him attached to her. PA was forced to admit him in his life and said that Alex was part of his private life, not his public one. So no we ain't gonna seen the two of them together.
I do not see the need for a sovereign to put the credentials of his illegitimate son on his website. The boy is not legit. This is real life: two consenting adults had hot casual sex for years, the man breaks up, the woman begs for one last night of lust and oups on that occasion gets pregnant. In a fairytale book he changes his mind and he's thrilled about the baby, they marry, she gives him many more kids and wears diamonds every day. In real life: he acknowledges the kid but she doesn't become a princess.