Search results

All eyes on her like at the Jubilee where she felt the need to lower the window of her car to be seen? And to play that skit at the window with the Philip and Tindall girls?

This is a comment I found in DM (of course). I find it to be one of the most insightful assessments I’ve read about the situation between William and Harry. I hope it isn’t off topic. “Every relationship has a breaking point, even familial ones. This conflict is far beyond bad arguments. Their...

Because Rachel Zane is just a fictional character while Rachel Meghan the Duchess of Sussex has nothing to do with Rachel Zane. And the styling of the fictional charater was done by the team from the series, while Meghan is her own stylist. :biggrin:

[.....] We don’t know if he’ll be at the coronation. When Charles was brought for a little while at his mother’s coronation it was because he was the heir apparent. Neither Louis nor Archie or Lili are, so there’s no real reason to bring them in. On the other hand, Louis has started school since...

I’d say it’s rather the Sussexes vs TRF. Maybe I am mistaken, I don’t remember anyone from TRF going to war against the Sussexes - did anyone say anything?

And she didn’t badmouth her family and country in interviews, book and on netflix.

Last year he missed Archie’s birthday to go play polo.

The most sensible solution indeed. And do I detect that Meghan’s hold on Harry is not the same as in September? Or is it wishful thinking…

If I were responsible, I would prepare two plans: with and without them.

Which is rude.

I think that was before their marriage, when options for Meghan were laid out. Remember, like she could have continued her career as an actress if she wished, then of course Charles was not going to financially support her. What disgusts me a lot with the Sussexes is the half truths, like “not...

She’s on a shopping spree! :)))

I think naive or gullible people always existed and will exist always. As are people who doubt everything.

It riles me when they say “support”. What does it mean? Did they donate? Did they organize anything at all? Or did they just rent their name? Which is perfectly acceptable, but more clarity would be so welcomed! Did they do something more substantial - you know, like involving themselves in the...

April 1st.

In my opinion they are birds of a feather.

Samantha can still appeal on the interview, not on the book. But it’s fair. As much as I have an opinion on Meghan, Samantha had no ground to sue for the book, no matter the involvement Meghan had in the writting.

The thing is that this is a thread about the Sussexes, so people will disscus the Sussexes. I am old enough to remember Elton John since before his marriage to Renate (incidentally, it was on the day the pregnancy with Harry was announced). I know what a diva he is and I don’t care. As I don’t...

And we might have an explanation. It’s always the big bad institution. I hope the link is acceptable. https://news.sky.com/story/prince-harry-says-royal-family-without-doubt-withheld-information-from-him-on-phone-hacking-12844296

Of course. But on one hand we don’t know how accurate Harry’s description is (remember “so called objective facts”) and on the other hand my problem is with him and his character, that lady or Ludgrove didn’t try to make money selling Harry’s story, it’s the other way around.

So you think she “deserved” to be mocked by Harry?

I have no knowledge or training in legalese, but what I understand is this: - If the information obtained unlawfully by the newspapers was published and the six year window from the date of the publishing has closed, there is no base to sue, - if, however, the information used was presented to...

What I see is that he’s looking the guy in the eye, he puts his hand out into the man’s stomach, I seem to see that he’s even deviating to the left a little bit in order to be able to bump. I have seen screen captures (or maybe photos) where he clearly looks into the guy’s eyes. I even doubted...

Agree to disagree. :flowers:

And archewell published it’s tax form for 2021: https://archewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/FINAL_ARCHEWELL-FOUNDATION-2021-FORM-990-PUBLIC-DISCLOSURE.pdf