I was rather bored by the whole book. It was written before it was known positively that Camilla and Charles would marry. The only time it moved me was to laugh that Camilla refused to curtsey to Sophie and that Sophie was mad about it.
Before. As I said, the book was written before the marriage. No reason is supplied. My guess is because she was sleeping with Charles when Sophie was a commoner in diapers.Australian said:Did she refuse to curtsey at Sophie before or after she married Charles? If it was before, why would she not cutrsey to her?
It is NOT open by my computer. That I recall no context was given. As I said before, the book was largely a disappointment. Very disjointed. I bought in on holiday in SA.Warren said:Since you have the book out and lying open by your computer, what was the context for the great Non-Curtsey Snub? Didn't the author offer any comment? You'd have thought she would have realised people would be talking and asking questions?
tiaraprin said:Sophie deserved that curtsey if Camilla was not married to Charles at the time. Quite distastefully rude behaviour. I hope Sophie doesn't curtsey to her.
That's not good enough, I'm sorry. There is no context or information or details whatsoever. If people want to use this to have a go at Camilla I'm afraid we have to have some actual facts. Even a baseless allegation wouldn't go astray. I'd say this is a dud book.dakodas said:Okay, I just found it! Page 271-272.
"Few people actively object to Camilla anymore, except perhaps Sophie Wessex, who gets upset if Mrs. Parker Bowles doesn't curtsey to her."
That's it, people. Sorry. No explanation.
It was reported after the Jubilee Concert that Ozzie was quite taken with Camilla's breasts as well. It must be an Osborne family fetish.dakodas said:On page 270, the author claims that Sharon Osbourne reached out with both hands and squeezed Camilla's busoms at a Golden Jubilee pop concert at BP. Sharon then supposedly said "You've got gorgeous old t&ts". What aplomb!
I have to agree. The only reason I have held on to it is because it is a flimsy paperback and I paid 103 SA rand for it. Books are so expensive there. We were there almost a month so I went through the reading materials I brought.Warren said:That's not good enough, I'm sorry. There is no context or information or details whatsoever. If people want to use this to have a go at Camilla I'm afraid we have to have some actual facts. Even a baseless allegation wouldn't go astray. I'd say this is a dud book.
Have you seen recent pics of Sharon? I think she got implants.Warren said:It was reported after the Jubilee Concert that Ozzie was quite taken with Camilla's breasts as well. It must be an Osborne family fetish.
Before or after she touched up Camilla?dakodas said:Have you seen recent pics of Sharon? I think she got implants.
after. I saw some taken a few weeks ago and Sharon looks rather amazing.Warren said:Before or after she touched up Camilla?
Is this evidence that Camilla has had an effect on people's lives we never would have thought possible?dakodas said:after. I saw some taken a few weeks ago and Sharon looks rather amazing.
Yes, envy is a terrible thing but imitation the sincerest form of flattery!Warren said:Is this evidence that Camilla has had an effect on people's lives we never would have thought possible?
As Zonk pointed out, there is no logic to this allegation-by-inference.Gladys said:The occasion is not specified. Just the statement as posted above. But you are right, to me that doesn't make sense either.