I stand by my comment...
I have no objection with you claiming that you can see Diana in William.
My objection is that you are suggesting with the comment
William certainly resembles his mother at times that I am wrong in not seeing it.
You see that phrase is a definite statement whereas I claim that it is your opinion. I have no problem with that being your opinion. What I object to is you stating your opinion as fact and therefore saying that I am wrong in not seeing it.
I see absolutely nothing of Diana in William or Harry. They have always looked like their father's side of the family to me. Now that is not stated as a fact because I have used the words 'I see' at the beginning making it perfectly clear that it is my opinion.
Your comment, using a direct quote from my post, is a direct accusation, to me, that I am wrong rather than a clear statement of your opinion, which you have every right to hold.
You do NOT have the right to tell me, or anyone else that my/our opinion is wrong just because you see things differently. That is the difference between my comments and yours - I clearly acknowledge that people can see Diana in William and/or Harry but that I can't and have never done so. You say that
William certainly resembles his mother at times which says that anyone who doesn't see William resembling his mother at times is wrong.
It is not your opinion I object to but you way of saying it that tells anyone who disagrees that they are wrong.
I hope you see my point as I do respect you and your many posts but I do think you need to be more careful with the wording so as not to claim an opinion as a fact and also not to accuse someone, even by implication, of being wrong because their opinion disagrees with yours.