William, Harry, their Girlfriends and the Press


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
It means that its a five year old picture. They reference Prince William's age as 23. Does the media even do fact checking anymore?
 
Why do fact checking when they have a story?
The article was published in 2006. But it must have resurfaced somewhere.
 
Why would they publish a story that was years ago??
Do they need a story that bad?
 
If i'm right it wasn't published in the UK, it was published over in the Netherlands?
 
I have NO idea why The Enquirer would show a photo that is obviously not recent BUT...of all the tabloids The Enquirer is the ONLY one I sometimes give any credence to...especially ever since they exposed that creep Senator John Edwards, and blew open the Tiger Woods mess...The Globe, The Star(which published a few weeks ago that KM was pregnant:bang:) and OK Mag are all garbage whose "facts" rarely pan out.

The Enquirer has pretty much ignored all things William/Kate...until this week.
 
Is it an absolute surety that this photo was a few years ago?
 
I am almost sure it's at least three years old...cause as I said Wiiliam has more hair in the picture.:sad:

Crown Princess the mag is on the stands until at least tomorrow if you want to check it out for yourself.
 
If he likes the ladies, why has he stayed with one girl most of his life?
According to Natasha Hamilton's actual website,

PRINCE'S TRUST 30TH BIRTHDAY CONCERT

Tash had a wonderful time at the Prince's Trust 30th Birthday Concert on Saturday where she performed three tracks, Son Of A Preacher Man, So Strong (written by Tash!) and the Abba classic Dancing Queen. Dancing Queen was televised, and Tash had great fun performing with eight dancers.

THAT kiss – just to set the record straight, Natasha and Prince William kissed on each cheek! The picture was a real fluke, Tash's tongue is not protruding it's actually the inside of her cheek and the shadow cast by the Prince. Tash is really embarrassed by the furore surrounding the picture and hopes it hasn't caused any trouble for the Prince and his girlfriend. Tash was accompanied to the gig by her boyfriend so he saw everything and knows it was totally innocent.
 
Why? because he likes Kate too! And she is convenient, willing, and very much available!
 
Why? because he likes Kate too! And she is convenient, willing, and very much available!

That defeats the objects if being a ladies man.
Staying with one person for 8 years, means you are in a commited relationship.
Your with several woman each year, that's a ladies man. Well IMO.

Also convenient, willing and available are not very nice words to use. Using words like that makes it seem like William is having this relationship out of neccesity because Kate is "avaliable"
 
:previous:Unfortunately the BRF do have a long history of extra marital affairs.

:ermm: I'm not really convinced Natasha slipped her tongue in at the last minute either when Wills lent in for the er polite kiss :lol:.
 
He kisses her on her left cheek, moves his head his left, and there she is...ready to get her picture in the papers. I really don't think that William would be so gauche as to french-kiss a girl during a line-up at an official event!:)

While looking over the pictures I was asking myself if Wills also had an affair with Dame Edna. :eek::D
 
He kisses her on her left cheek, moves his head his left, and there she is...ready to get her picture in the papers. I really don't think that William would be so gauche as to french-kiss a girl during a line-up at an official event!:)

That was exactly my thought process when I first saw this picture. How likely is it that he would kiss her in public like this, when he has been so discrete with Kate in all these years?
 
I'm sorry I couldn't reply sooner. I spend the entire evening with a few colleagues having dinner and a night out at a casino...

Anyway.. I saw that article yesterday in the newspaper. I didn't believe it, but it's in a newspaper so technically it's "news". I tried to read the article in the National Enquirer, but their site made that impossible.

The article says that Will cheated on Kate and that she doesn't plan on tolerating such a dreadful thing. She doesn't like his behavior of the past 7 years. They also mention the thing back in 1996 and how that photo is still haunting her and that she just can't trust him...

'Prins William ging vreemd' - Privé - Nieuws over showbizz, 24 uur actueel [prive]

That's just about it really.....
 
2006, not 1996.
Behaviour in the past 7 years? What behaviour?
 
Well it could happen.
When two people move in for a kiss on the cheek, one or both may accidentally turn their heads too fast and then end up grazing each others lips or kissing.
But she stuck her tongue out...so that makes me wonder if she was trying to get a picture taken or some lip-action.
 
IN MIND OPINION THIS IS BULL****! That picture shows me a woman that wanted to take advantage of Prince William nothing more. We think the Prince and Middleton are living together now and that photo shoot trivia . It really must be a slow news day. I think if I was William and Catherine I would be laughing at this one. :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That old 2006 photo was from William greeting a line of people. Do you really think this would happen in front of a bunch of people? The camera just happened to catch the greeting at a certain angle to make it look like they were kissing on the mouth. She was probably talking while William went to kiss her cheek. And she does not have her tongue out.
And of course the other news outlets are picking up on this non-story. :rolleyes:
 
2006, not 1996.
Behaviour in the past 7 years? What behaviour?

Oeps.. right... well I'm only 10 years off... ;)

Anyway, I don't know.. I didn't make up the article nor do I believe it. National Enquirer isn't exactly known for their truthful stories...
 
Oh jeez:

Prince William and Kate Middleton –Things turned sour | Entertainment Biz!

Many are quite unable to figure out why a snap as old as four years has surfaced now. The truth is that the photograph seemed to hit Kate Middleton quite hard. The snapshot of Prince William kissing Natasha Hamilton also made it to some magazines during that time .Kate have realized that Prince William will disappoint her in the near future if they plan to get hitched and there might be a possibility of him cheating on her.

Please! The media totally wants this couple to break up and they are trying to instigate it! I believe Wills and Kate are stronger than that.

Now watch: the couple will be out in public soon, holding hands, whatever, as proof that they are still going strong. Remember that late night kiss outside the pub? Right after video of Kate's uncle surfaced?
 
I'm sure Kate is wise enough to the rag press to not let something that happened in ancient history bother her. Shows too how little the rags have to really write about this couple.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I saw this article when looking at Kate's wikipedia.
I don't think the press are trying to split them up, why would they? Kate and William sell better than a lot of other things. They are just printing the same story everyone else is.
And IMO if they do suddenly come out and show us holding hands, that means they have read this trash and decided to react to it, when they should just leave it alone because it means nothing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't tell me you were actually expecting new information?
I browsed that issue on the newstand, it was absolute drivel.
Their hard hitting exclusive about K&W 'marital' arrangements? Wait for it: Kate stays with her parents during the week and spends her w-e with him.
Err... like she has been doing since forever? I fail to see how that's living like 'man and wife'.

If I had paid for that nonsense, I would be pretty furious. Luckily I only ever buy Hello when they have pictures of the Jolie-Piit kids (don't judge, we all have our weaknesses :lol:)
 
That defeats the objects if being a ladies man.
Staying with one person for 8 years, means you are in a commited relationship.
Your with several woman each year, that's a ladies man. Well IMO.

Also convenient, willing and available are not very nice words to use. Using words like that makes it seem like William is having this relationship out of neccesity because Kate is "avaliable"

Hi Lumutqueen: I'm not sure how old you are, but sometimes, it takes an older and wiser head (from experience) to know that men who are labelled a "ladies man" may take one "main woman" and flirt or cheat on the side.

I can see your definition too, but, from my experience, that phrase is a euphemism, if you know what I mean. ;)

And, a 'committed relationship' can still mean "convenience", or 'necessity', to use your word. Honestly, it could well be the truth, because that is human nature.

If Kate is with William when he has time or the inclination on the weekends and living with her parents during the week, this relationship has all the dreaded hallmarks of convenience, from my own experience. Sorry, but, IMO, this relationship is going nowhere - fast. :ermm: I've thought that for some time.

IMO, the press intrusion into their relationship is just a convenient excuse for William to not "bring Kate out into the open". What is he: a decent man-to-be-King or a petulant child? Of course, he cannot keep her cloistered entirely, but he does a darn good job of it, just the same. :whistling:

Many older people in my own experience will tell you that if a man really loves a woman and wants to make her his wife, everyone will know about it. Prince or pauper. Men are tribal and proud that way - generally speaking. Just like a woman gets that glow from true love. I see the exact opposite with this pair; I see Kate deteriorating rapidly in public, and honestly, it's sad. I hope she gets the support and help she needs from her family. :sad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom