Now ... that is something else.Lalla Meriem Posted: May 25th, 2004 - 10:07 pm
Albert was almost entirely reared by Rainier after he was 2. He was actually kept away from Grace most of the time as Rainier didn't want him to become soft and coddled. He was to depend on Rainier for his needs not Grace.
Well put!Originally posted by renats@May 12th, 2004 - 1:09 am
I think that personal image is more important to Monaco than to the other royal families. Tourism is a very big deal for the country and they have to show beautiful(literally) images of the country and of themselves.
The problem with the Grimaldis is that they have a lot more potential than they use.
Let me talk a little about the 2 things that I was reffering when I said the word "beautiful".
Right now, the "looker" in the family is definetelly Charlotte. And imo, she is NO WAY, NO HOW, the one with the natural good looks in the family. Stephanie and Andrea do not take advantage of their natural beauty. Stephanie is 39. She's not that old! If the 2 of them took more care of their appearence and were knowed for their ability to dress, they could bring a lot of fascination to Monaco. With the others being the supporters, also having to take care of their appearence more. Not even the kids are looking as good as they could(ok, let's excuse Pauline of this one because her "problem" is a health treatment).
The second thing are the beautiful pictures. During "Grace's time", a lot of amazing pictures were produced and liberated to the press(whether they gave or sold them it's another story). From the past, we have amazing christmans cards, pictures of them preparing their christmans, great official pictures, pictures of them having fun in the gardens of the palace, playing games inside, in roc angel, during vacations, posing for unformal pictures in all of those places and a lot more. What do we have from the present? With a few exceptions, we only have pictures taken in events and paparazzi stuff. How is THAT going to fascinate people?
Well put! [/b][/quote]Originally posted by chanel+May 28th, 2004 - 12:46 am--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (chanel @ May 28th, 2004 - 12:46 am)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-renats@May 12th, 2004 - 1:09 am
I think that personal image is more important to Monaco than to the other royal families. Tourism is a very big deal for the country and they have to show beautiful(literally) images of the country and of themselves.
The problem with the Grimaldis is that they have a lot more potential than they use.
Let me talk a little about the 2 things that I was reffering when I said the word "beautiful".
Right now, the "looker" in the family is definetelly Charlotte. And imo, she is NO WAY, NO HOW, the one with the natural good looks in the family. Stephanie and Andrea do not take advantage of their natural beauty. Stephanie is 39. She's not that old! If the 2 of them took more care of their appearence and were knowed for their ability to dress, they could bring a lot of fascination to Monaco. With the others being the supporters, also having to take care of their appearence more. Not even the kids are looking as good as they could(ok, let's excuse Pauline of this one because her "problem" is a health treatment).
The second thing are the beautiful pictures. During "Grace's time", a lot of amazing pictures were produced and liberated to the press(whether they gave or sold them it's another story). From the past, we have amazing christmans cards, pictures of them preparing their christmans, great official pictures, pictures of them having fun in the gardens of the palace, playing games inside, in roc angel, during vacations, posing for unformal pictures in all of those places and a lot more. What do we have from the present? With a few exceptions, we only have pictures taken in events and paparazzi stuff. How is THAT going to fascinate people?
Absolutely! [/b][/quote]Originally posted by kloss+May 28th, 2004 - 11:06 am--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kloss @ May 28th, 2004 - 11:06 am)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by chanel@May 28th, 2004 - 12:46 am
<!--QuoteBegin-renats@May 12th, 2004 - 1:09 am
I think that personal image is more important to Monaco than to the other royal families. Tourism is a very big deal for the country and they have to show beautiful(literally) images of the country and of themselves.
The problem with the Grimaldis is that they have a lot more potential than they use.
Let me talk a little about the 2 things that I was reffering when I said the word "beautiful".
Right now, the "looker" in the family is definetelly Charlotte. And imo, she is NO WAY, NO HOW, the one with the natural good looks in the family. Stephanie and Andrea do not take advantage of their natural beauty. Stephanie is 39. She's not that old! If the 2 of them took more care of their appearence and were knowed for their ability to dress, they could bring a lot of fascination to Monaco. With the others being the supporters, also having to take care of their appearence more. Not even the kids are looking as good as they could(ok, let's excuse Pauline of this one because her "problem" is a health treatment).
The second thing are the beautiful pictures. During "Grace's time", a lot of amazing pictures were produced and liberated to the press(whether they gave or sold them it's another story). From the past, we have amazing christmans cards, pictures of them preparing their christmans, great official pictures, pictures of them having fun in the gardens of the palace, playing games inside, in roc angel, during vacations, posing for unformal pictures in all of those places and a lot more. What do we have from the present? With a few exceptions, we only have pictures taken in events and paparazzi stuff. How is THAT going to fascinate people?
Well put!
Is that right? Do you know something more about those women?Originally posted by Lalla Meriem@May 26th, 2004 - 12:21 pm
He was almost married 2 times and they were, by his own admission, scared off by the postion and the publicity.
hrhcp said:Now ... that is something else.
From earlier comments elsewhere, it could be suggested that Albert doesn't like women. Now, I wonder if Albert picked up on his Father's likes and dislikes. If it could be argued that Albert doesn't like women, you mean to say Rainier doesn't like women ?
HRHDUKESTANCIL said:I have been a fan of this family for many years. After I found this site and viewed all the spectacular official pics and private pics of the PR,PG,PA,PC,PS and their events. PR & PG really changed the perception of this country and being accepted by other royals.
Now we have PA. I am not saying he is doing a bad job maybe I'm just missing the magic PR & PG had.
I know we have PC and PS and their children- if PA was married and had his legitimate heirs. The " look" of the family would be quiet diffrent
Not taking anything away from beautiful PC and the hard work she puts in, but.. I dont know,, Im rambling on.....
As usual bbb you are right on the money about Caro-bbb said:i agree hibou, the glamour and fairytale aspect is missing, with a prince not garnering much respect, his playboy lifestyle, bad taste in official companion, and long absences whats to admire. i wish he'd step down and let caroline and her children take over, that way he can disappear, chase skirts all over the world and monaco can get some good publicity for a change. i don't consider the tabloids made up stories of his love for charlene blah blah blah good publicity, since it all looks so fake, like it's a plan with the palace to push her on the public and make us accept her. he needs to get a clue-NOT GOING TO HAPPEN, she's not suitable in anyway, form or fashion. i think Caroline been doing the heavy lifting since her mother died, i greatly admire her, albert on the other hand.......
I agree with you. I think Albert would a better honorary editor of Playboy magazine than a figurehead of a country. He certainly is an expert in playboyhood.bbb said:i agree hibou, the glamour and fairytale aspect is missing, with a prince not garnering much respect, his playboy lifestyle, bad taste in official companion, and long absences whats to admire. i wish he'd step down and let caroline and her children take over, that way he can disappear, chase skirts all over the world and monaco can get some good publicity for a change. i don't consider the tabloids made up stories of his love for charlene blah blah blah good publicity, since it all looks so fake, like it's a plan with the palace to push her on the public and make us accept her. he needs to get a clue-NOT GOING TO HAPPEN, she's not suitable in anyway, form or fashion. i think Caroline been doing the heavy lifting since her mother died, i greatly admire her, albert on the other hand.......
royal pauper said:What is missing from Monaco?
What a great question.
If I may answer: It's missing an intelligent, serious and mature Prince!
JMO