- Joined
- Jun 30, 2009
- Messages
- 44,313
- City
- An Iarmhí
- Country
- Ireland
King Oskar II is his Coronation regalia and mantle.
From what I've heard rumored (but without a valid source) the main difference will be that Victoria won't take her seat on the Silver throne. Besides that to me the big questions are if the Royal Trabants of Karl XI will be included in the ceremony and if Queen Victoria and other female members of the Royal family will be in court dress (as in a floor length gown not the old State robes) or if she will have simplified the dress code.I liked the Swedish "solution" of draping the ermine mantle over the throne. When I saw King Willem-Alexander in 2013 with that ermine, I thought: that is really an anachronism.
Of course monarchy is an anachronism itself, but using the ermine as an attribute rather than wearing it was an elegant Swedish solution for modern era.
I hope Queen Victoria will use these monarchal attributes as well. Seeing the three Swedish royal weddings, the funeral of Princess Lilian, the Nobel festivities, I am sure the Investiture of Queen Victoria will be a grand and stylish affair.
In a way is it sad that a future Queen Victoria won't take her seat on the Silver throne, on the other hand very reasonable. The Silver throne is no longer in use, and no one has taken his or her seat on the throne since the last State Opening of the Riksdag in 1974.From what I've heard rumored (but without a valid source) the main difference will be that Victoria won't take her seat on the Silver throne. Besides that to me the big questions are if the Royal Trabants of Karl XI will be included in the ceremony and if Queen Victoria and other female members of the Royal family will be in court dress (as in a floor length gown not the old State robes) or if she will have simplified the dress code.
From what I've heard rumored (but without a valid source) the main difference will be that Victoria won't take her seat on the Silver throne. Besides that to me the big questions are if the Royal Trabants of Karl XI will be included in the ceremony and if Queen Victoria and other female members of the Royal family will be in court dress (as in a floor length gown not the old State robes) or if she will have simplified the dress code.
Could she opt for a simple swearing-in ceremony at the Riksdag chamber similar to the current Spanish or Belgian practice? That would be consistent with the Parliament Act, which says that the Head of State may make a "statement of office" (Google translation, probably not the best one) before a session of Parliament.
I am not sure the Hall of State and the Silver Throne will be used as in 1973.
But why would they wanted to do so? The Swedes typically seem to like their lavish ceremonies so why reduce the installation of a new monarch to a more limited ceremony?
For the same reason that the state opening of Parliament was downgraded after 1975. Victoria will be the first monarch to be inaugurated under the new Instrument of Government, which radically changed the constitutional position of the King.
Here's a reply by Associate professor in Legal history Martin Sunnqvist (who wrote the commentary to the parliaments inquiry into a modern honours system, flag days and the royal family's finances)DN Debate article
"The next head of state must be governed more strictly by the politicians"
The form of government is a renunciation of the job description for the king. This has given King Carl XVI Gustaf, who in theory should be powerless, great power to elevate the ideals and groups he sees fit. To suddenly change the rules of the game now would be wrong. But the future head of state should be protected from unilateral external influence, writes author and professor Mikael Holmqvist.
”Nästa statschef måste styras hårdare av politikerna” - DN.SE
Translation
Who knows what will happen. Only the first and second verses would need some adaption and while the first could prove a little tricky it can be done so the lyrics will most likely be adapted.What will happen to the Swedish Royal Anthem, Kungssången, when Victoria is Queen? Unlike the UK's God Save the King, the lyrics of the King's Song seem cumbersome to adapt to female titles and pronouns. Will the lyrics change or will they be kept the same even though the monarch is a Queen and not a King?
What will happen to the Swedish Royal Anthem, Kungssången, when Victoria is Queen? Unlike the UK's God Save the King, the lyrics of the King's Song seem cumbersome to adapt to female titles and pronouns. Will the lyrics change or will they be kept the same even though the monarch is a Queen and not a King?
DN Debate article
"The next head of state must be governed more strictly by the politicians"
The form of government is a renunciation of the job description for the king. This has given King Carl XVI Gustaf, who in theory should be powerless, great power to elevate the ideals and groups he sees fit. To suddenly change the rules of the game now would be wrong. But the future head of state should be protected from unilateral external influence, writes author and professor Mikael Holmqvist.
”Nästa statschef måste styras hårdare av politikerna” - DN.SE
Translation
Here's a reply by Associate professor in Legal history Martin Sunnqvist (who wrote the commentary to the parliaments inquiry into a modern honours system, flag days and the royal family's finances)
https://www.dn.se/debatt/hardare-politisk-styrning-av-statschefen-gor-mer-skada-an-nytta/
Translation:
https://www-dn-se.translate.goog/de...l=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=sv&_x_tr_pto=wapp